Test "how do you feel about criticism." Test “How do you feel about criticism? Test how you feel about criticism

Pechkazova Svetlana Petrovna,

Literature teacher MBOU "Lyceum No. 1"

r.p.Chamzinka Republic of Mordovia

based on the story

V.M.Shukshina

"Critics"

DIDACTIC MATERIAL

FOR A LITERATURE LESSON IN 6TH GRADE

check level

students’ assimilation and understanding of the content of the story

V.M.Shukshina “Critics”:

its theme, storyline, language means, etc.

Enter years of life

V.M.Shukshina:

a) 1929 – 1974;

b) 1939 – 1984;

c) 1949 – 1994

Shukshin's works

often call:

a) “extra people”;

b) “strange people”;

c) “wonderful people”;

Shukshin's works

were his contemporaries:

a) teachers and engineers;

b) workers and collective farmers;

c) scientists and military

Genre of the work

"Critics":

a) story;

b) story;

The work of "Critics"

V.M. Shukshin wrote:

a) in 1954;

b) in 1964;

Main character's last name

story "Critics":

a) Novopoltsev;

b) Novokoltsev;

c) Novoskoltsev

The retired grandfather worked on a collective farm in the past:

a) an agronomist;

b) livestock specialist;

c) a carpenter

How old was grandfather?

How old was the grandson:

Why Petka and grandfather

were friends:

a) they both loved going to the movies;

b) the grandfather agreed with his grandson in everything;

c) both grandfather and Petka have a sense of justice

a) grandfather was fat and kind;

b) was dry and nervous

c) wise and calm

a) persistent and attentive;

b) cheerful and nimble;

c) shy and stubborn

Grandfather cried at the movies if...:

a) saw the falsity;

b) the film was about love;

c) killed an innocent person

What heroes did grandfather not like:

a) dishonest and greedy;

b) those that seemed fake;

c) cruel and evil

Who came to visit

to Petka's parents:

a) relatives from the city;

b) relatives from the regional center;

c) acquaintances from the village

Why a city man

began to argue with my grandfather:

a) he wanted to show that his grandfather was old and stupid;

b) defended the acting;

c) he defended his point of view

Why was the grandfather offended by the guests:

a) the guests were wrong;

b) the guests laughed at the grandfather and his “truth”;

c) they didn’t pay attention to their grandfather

What did grandfather mean when he said

that “people are always the same”:

a) people are similar to each other;

b) at all times people must live according to the laws of conscience;

c) there are more bad people than good ones

How grandfather decided to prove

being right:

a) called a policeman for help;

b) began to argue with the guests;

c) broke the TV screen with his boot

What measures did the adults take to “pacify” the grandfather:

a) talked to him cordially;

b) called the police;

c) gave him tea and pies

What was the name of Petka’s grandfather:

a) Trofim Makarych;

b) Makar Timofeich;

c) Timofey Makarych

How do we find out the name of Petka’s grandfather:

a) from a conversation with a neighbor;

b) from dialogue with guests;

c) from a report drawn up by a policeman

Why did Petka cry bitterly when the policeman took his grandfather away:

a) he got angry with the guests;

b) I am sure that the grandfather is not to blame;

c) believed that this was an unfair punishment

in this story:

a) grandfather’s eccentricity;

b) the old man’s incontinence;

c) indifference and mocking attitude towards older people

What a story

V.M.Shukshina “Critics”:

a) about the offense of a tipsy grandfather;

b) about an unjustly offended boy;

c) about a person’s desperate protest against untruth and disrespect for himself

“They loved cinema more than anything else”:

a) epithet;

b) comparison;

c) hyperbole

What technique is used in the sentence

“Only once did he have a strong fight with the adults”:

a) metaphor;

b) comparison;

c) epithet

How do you rate

your work in class:

Solid knowledge:

Well done!

There were many errors:

need to be more careful

BE CAREFUL!

5

Thanks to all!

EXIT

• Egorova N.V., Makarova B.A. Universal lesson developments in literature: 6th grade - M.: VAKO, 2015
• Eremina O.A. Literature lessons in 6th grade: book. for teachers - M: Prosveshchenie, 2014
• Literature. 6th grade Textbook for general education. institutions. At 4 o'clock / Polukhina V.P.; edited by Korovina V.Ya. – M.: Education, 2016

Some benefit from criticism, others wince but tolerate it, while others actively fight critics and “nip in the bud” any germs of criticism. Some believe that it helps the cause, others think that it hinders.

However, whether we like it or not, criticism is inherent in any team, and a modern leader cannot be considered literate if he is not familiar with all the complexities and subtleties of this phenomenon.

The proposed test will help determine how you feel about criticism, whether you can control your emotions when someone criticizes you, whether you lose your sense of proportion when criticizing others, and whether you are able to admit your mistakes.

For each question, mark the answer that suits you best.

Questions:

1. Do you consider criticism a method of eliminating shortcomings in the work of individuals or a team?

a) I consider criticism a necessary and normal element of the life of any team;

b) Criticism only complicates relationships in the team, so I don’t recognize it;

c) Criticism is acceptable, but its role should not be exaggerated and it should not be used frequently.

2. How do you feel about “public” criticism?

a) I consider such criticism to be an effective form of overcoming shortcomings;

b) I believe that it is better to express any comments to a person in private, in an office, than publicly, in public;

c) I prefer “behind the scenes” criticism, i.e. criticism “behind the scenes”, in an unofficial setting or expressed in a half-joking form.

3. Do you think it is possible to criticize your superiors?

a) Of course;

c) It is possible, but very carefully.

4. How do you feel about self-criticism?

a) I try to be objective towards myself and, if I see shortcomings, I openly admit them myself, without waiting for others to point them out;

b) Usually I know the shortcomings in the work of my department and mine personally, but I am in no hurry to criticize myself;

c) There is no point in criticizing yourself, since there are always enough people who want to scold you.

5. When making critical remarks, do you try to express yourself softly, tactfully, correctly, so as not to offend the personality of the person being criticized?

a) Yes, of course;

b) No, I think that the more the personality of the person being criticized is affected, the more effective the criticism;

c) Everything depends on this very “personality”: if she is very touchy, I take this into account, and if not, I am not particularly diplomatic.

6. When making critical comments, do you try to “sweeten the pill” by pointing out the positive aspects in the activities of the object of criticism?

a) I usually try;

b) I don’t see the point in this;

c) If I don’t know the person being criticized well or I know that he is touchy, then I try.

7. Do you measure the amount of criticism, do you try to maintain a certain “measure”?

a) Yes, I criticize for no more than one shortcoming;

b) No, I usually express everything that, in my opinion, is bad in the activities of the object of criticism;

c) I try to criticize only the subject of discussion.

8. During your critical speech, do you make any proposals to correct the situation or limit yourself to pointing out existing shortcomings?

a) Yes, I think that the one who criticizes must offer something, otherwise he has no right to criticize, so I try to make some suggestions;

b) No, I believe that the main thing is to expose the problem, point out the shortcoming, and how to eliminate it is up to the criticized service or other competent authorities and specialists;

c) As a rule, constructive criticism is preferable, but even if it is difficult to offer anything, you still cannot hush up the shortcomings.

9. What is usually your first reaction to criticism?

a) I try to answer immediately, I immediately ask to speak or speak from my seat;

b) I worry silently, with resentment, and try to avoid responding;

c) I think about the criticism, I’m in no hurry to respond, but if they insist, I don’t refuse,

10. What behavior is most typical for you when responding to criticism?

a) As a rule, I try to acknowledge criticism, even if it is not objective in everything;

b) I resort to the method of “defense against the contrary,” that is, I criticize the critic;

11. Does criticism irritate you?

a) Yes, as a rule;

b) Not really;

c) Depends on who criticizes and how.

12. Do you develop a feeling of hostility towards the person who criticizes you?

a) Yes, as a rule;

b) No, extremely rarely;

c) Yes, if the criticism is unfair or expressed in a harsh, offensive manner.

13. How do you further build your relationship with the criticizing person?

a) As before;

b) I try, on occasion, to “reciprocate” or to infringe upon his interests in other ways available to me;

c) I “go around” this person for some time, trying not to come into contact with him.

14. How do you feel about those who criticize themselves?

a) I consider them “opportunists”, “cowards”, “pleasers”;

b) I have a normal attitude, what’s special here;

c) I advise you not to rush into self-criticism in the future.

15. Is there criminal liability for harassing critics?

c) I don’t know.

16. Joke question: Which of the following statements about criticism resonates with you?

a) Criticism is a medicine, one must be able to “apply and accept” it;

b) Management activity is also creativity, so let those who deserve to evaluate me;

c) And there is a fashion for criticism.

Instructions:

Determine the number of points you scored on the answer rating scale.

Results:

8–18 points. Your attitude towards criticism is more negative than positive. You do not like it when people criticize you, and when criticizing others, you often lose your sense of proportion. In both cases, you are very emotional, easily excited, can flare up, and be harsh. You need to cultivate a certain “stability complex,” that is, a sense of self-confidence in the legitimacy of your actions and decisions, and for this you should actively increase your business level, without overestimating yourself, but also without belittling your merits.

19–32 points. You are tolerant of criticism and consider it an acceptable element of business life, without, however, overestimating its importance. Your behavior in the roles of the criticized and the criticizing can be described as “controlled emotionality” - you rarely “lose your temper.” At the same time, you are not alien to the feeling of resentment, the desire to “annoy” critics, to justify your mistakes.

33–45 points. You take criticism in a business-like manner, perceive it quite calmly, and courageously and openly admit your mistakes. Occasionally you feel annoyed by criticism, but you try to hide it. In critical speeches, you do not overdo it, do not try to justify yourself by blaming others. Good knowledge of your business, confidence that you are in the right place, allow you not to worry about personal authority, but to remember only the benefits of the business.

Some benefit from criticism, others wince but endure, others actively fight critics and “nip in the bud” any germs of criticism. Some believe that it helps the cause, others believe that it hinders. Some know how to use criticism, others do not.

However, whether we like it or not, criticism is inherent in every social organism, which is any collective, and a modern collective cannot be considered literate if it is not familiar with all the complexities and subtleties of this phenomenon. The proposed test will help you determine the level of your personal literacy in this area. And although, like all such tests, it does not claim to be indisputable, we think it will help you in your business development.

1. Do you consider criticism a method of eliminating shortcomings in the work of individuals or teams?

a) yes, I consider criticism a necessary and normal element of the life of any team;

b) criticism only complicates relationships in the team, so I don’t recognize it;

c) criticism is acceptable, but its role should not be exaggerated and it should not be used frequently.

2. How do you deal with public criticism?

a) I consider public criticism to be an effective form of overcoming shortcomings;

b) I believe that it is better to express any comments to a person in private, in an office, than publicly, in public;

c) I prefer “behind-the-scenes criticism,” that is, criticism “behind the eyes,” in an off-duty setting or expressed in a half-joking form.

3. Do you think it is possible to criticize your superiors?

a) yes, of course;

c) it is possible, but very carefully.

4. How do you feel about self-criticism?

a) I try to be objective towards myself and “my” service and, if I see shortcomings, I openly admit them myself, without waiting for others to point them out;

b) usually I know the shortcomings in the work of “my” service and mine personally, but I am in no hurry to criticize myself;

c) there is no need to criticize yourself, since there are always enough people who want to scold you.

5. When making critical comments, do you try to express yourself softly, correctly, tactfully, so as not to offend the personality of the person being criticized?

a) yes, of course;

b) no, I think that the more the personality of the person being criticized is affected, the more effective the criticism;

c) everything depends on this very “personality”; if she is very touchy, I take this into account, and if not, I am not particularly diplomatic.

6. When making critical comments, do you try to “sweeten the pill” by pointing out the positive aspects in the activities of the object of criticism?

a) yes, I usually try;

b) no, I don’t see the point in this;

c) if I don’t know the person being criticized well or I know that he is touchy, then I try.

7. Do you measure the amount of criticism, do you try to maintain a certain “measure of criticism”?

a) yes, I try to criticize for no more than one shortcoming;

b) no, I usually express everything that, in my opinion, is bad in the activities of the object of criticism;

c) I try to limit the field of criticism to the subject of discussion.

8. During a critical speech, do you make any proposals to correct the situation or limit yourself to pointing out existing shortcomings?

a) yes, I believe that the one who criticizes must offer something, otherwise he has no right to criticize, so I try to make some suggestions;

b) no, I believe that the main thing is to expose the problem, point out the shortcomings, and how to eliminate them is the business of the criticized service or other competent authorities and specialists;

c) as a rule, constructive criticism is preferable, but even if it is difficult to offer anything, you still cannot hush up the shortcomings.

9. What is usually your first reaction to criticism?

a) I strive to answer immediately, I immediately ask to speak or speak from my seat;

b) I worry in silence, with resentment, and I try to avoid responding;

c) I think about the criticism, I’m in no hurry to respond, but if they insist, I don’t refuse.

10. What behavior is most typical for you when responding to criticism?

a) as a rule, I try to acknowledge criticism, even if it is not objective in everything;

b) I resort to the method of “defense against the contrary,” that is, I criticize the critic;

11. Does criticism irritate you?

a) yes, as a rule;

b) not very much;

c) depending on who criticizes and how.

12. Do you have a feeling of hostility towards the person who criticizes you?

a) yes, as a rule;

b) no, extremely rarely;

c) yes, if the criticism is unfair or expressed in a harsh, offensive form.

13. How do you further build your relationship with the person who criticizes you?

a) as before;

b) I try, on occasion, to “reciprocate” or infringe on his interests in another way available to me;

c) I “go around” this person for some time, trying not to come into contact with him.

14. How do you feel about those who criticize themselves?

a) I consider them “opportunists”, “cowards”, “pleasers”;

b) I’m okay with what’s special here;

y c) I advise you not to rush into self-criticism in the future.

15. Is there criminal liability for persecuting critics?

c) I don’t know.

16. Joke question: which statement about criticism is closest to you?

a) criticism is medicine, you need to be able to apply and accept it;

b) management activity is also creativity, so let me be evaluated by those who are supposed to, and not by everyone who is not too lazy;

c) there is a fashion for criticism.

Determine the number of points you scored on the answer rating scale:

	A	b	V
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.		I
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.

8-18 points:

Your attitude towards criticism is more negative than positive. You do not like it when people criticize you, and when criticizing others, you often lose your sense of proportion. In both cases, you are very emotional, easily excited, can flare up, and be harsh. You need to cultivate a certain “stability complex,” that is, a sense of self-confidence in the legitimacy of your actions and decisions, and for this you should actively increase your business level, without overestimating yourself, but also without belittling your merits.

19-32 points:

You are tolerant of criticism and consider it an acceptable element of managerial life, without, however, overestimating its importance. Your behavior in the roles of the criticized and the criticizing can be described as “controlled emotionality.” You rarely lose your temper. At the same time, you are not alien to the feeling of resentment, the desire to “annoy” critics, to justify your mistakes.

33-46 points:

You take criticism in a businesslike manner, perceive it quite calmly, courageously and openly admit your mistakes. Occasionally you are visited by a feeling of annoyance at criticism, but you try to hide it. In critical speeches, you do not overdo it: you do not try to justify yourself by blaming others. Good knowledge of your business, confidence that you are in the right place, allow you not to worry about personal authority, but to remember only the benefits of the business.

Appendix 7.

Conflict formulas

Conflictogens– These are words, actions (or lack of actions) that can lead to conflict.

V.P. Sheinov in his book “Conflicts in our lives and their resolution” gives three conflict formulas (three corresponding types of conflicts A, B and C):

1. Reflects the dependence of the conflict (CF) on conflictogens (CFG):

KFG 1 KFG 2 KFG 3…. KF,

where KFG 1 is the first conflictogen; KFG 2 – the second conflictogen, in response to the first; KFG 3 is the third conflictogen, in response to the second, etc.

It is important to keep in mind that KFG 2 > KFG 1; KFG 3 > KFG 2, etc., i.e. each response conflictogen is stronger than the one to which it responds ( Law of conflict escalation). The mechanism for the development of type A conflict is based on the negative perception and negative reaction of the person against whom the conflictogen is used. In the absence of volitional regulation of such a reaction, it tends to develop according to the law of escalation, i.e. increase.

80% of conflicts arise beyond the wishes of their participants and according to the above formula.

Individual task No. 15 “How do you feel about criticism?” (Silchenko A.F., Sannikov P.I. IVF, 1969, No. 2)

Some benefit from criticism, others frown but endure, and others actively fight. Some believe that it helps the cause, others think it hinders, some know how to use criticism, others do not.

But criticism is one of the effective methods of education, and a modern leader cannot be considered prepared and experienced if he has not mastered all the subtleties of criticism. Check it out for yourself.

Assignment: mark the most acceptable option for each question (calculation of points after the questions).

1. Do you consider criticism a method of eliminating shortcomings in the work of individuals or teams?

a) yes, I consider criticism a necessary and normal element of the life of any team;

b) criticism only complicates relationships in the team, so I don’t recognize it;

c) criticism is acceptable, but its role should not be exaggerated and it should not be used frequently.

2. How do you feel about public criticism?

a) I consider public criticism to be an effective form of overcoming shortcomings;

b) I believe that it is better to express any comments to a person in private, in an office, than publicly, in public;

c) I prefer “behind-the-scenes criticism,” that is, criticism “behind the eyes,” in an off-duty setting or expressed in a half-joking form.

3. Do you think it is possible to criticize your superiors?

a) yes, of course;

c) it is possible, but very carefully.

4. How do you feel about self-criticism?

a) I try to be objective towards myself and “my” service and, if I see shortcomings, I openly admit them myself, without waiting for others to point them out;

b) usually I know the shortcomings in the work of “my” service and mine personally, but I am in no hurry to criticize myself;

c) there is no point in criticizing yourself, because there are always enough people who want to scold you.

5. When making critical remarks, do you try to express yourself softly, correctly, tactfully, so as not to offend the personality of the person being criticized?

a) yes, of course;

b) no, I think that the more the personality of the person being criticized is affected, the more effective the criticism;

c) everything depends on this very “personality”: if she is already very touchy, I take this into account, and if not, I am not particularly diplomatic.

6. When making critical comments, do you try to “sweeten the pill” by pointing out the positive aspects in the activities of the object of criticism?

a) yes, I usually try;

b) no, I don’t see it in that sense;

c) if I don’t know the person being criticized well, or I know that he is touchy, then I try.

7. Do you measure the amount of criticism, do you try to maintain a certain “measure of criticism”?

a) yes, I try to criticize for no more than one shortcoming;

b) no, I usually express everything that, in my opinion, is bad in the activities of the object of criticism;

c) I try to limit the field of criticism to the subject of discussion.

8. During a critical speech, do you make any proposals to correct the situation or limit yourself to pointing out existing shortcomings?

a) yes, I believe that the one who criticizes must offer something, otherwise he has no right to criticize, so I try to make some suggestions;

b) no, I believe that the main thing is to expose the problem, point out the shortcomings, and how to eliminate them is up to the critics and specialists;

c) as a rule, constructive criticism is preferable, but even if it is difficult to offer anything, you still cannot hush up the shortcomings.

9. What is usually your first reaction to criticism?

a) I strive to answer immediately, I immediately ask to speak or speak from my seat;

b) I worry in silence, with resentment, and I try to avoid responding;

c) I think about the criticism, I’m in no hurry to respond, but if they insist, I don’t refuse.

10. What behavior is most typical for you when responding to criticism?

a) as a rule, I try to acknowledge criticism, even if it is not objective in everything;

b) I resort to the method of “defense against the contrary,” that is, I criticize the critic;

11. Does criticism irritate you?

a) yes, as a rule;

b) not very much;

c) depending on who criticizes and how.

12. Do you develop a feeling of hostility towards the person who criticizes you?

a) yes, as a rule;

b) no, extremely rarely;

c) yes, if the criticism is unfair, or expressed in a harsh, offensive manner.

13. How do you continue to build your relationships with people who criticize you?

a) as before;

b) I try, on occasion, to “reciprocate” or infringe on his interests in another way available to me;

c) I “go around” this person for some time, trying not to come into contact with him.

14. How do you feel about those who criticize themselves?

a) I consider them “opportunists”, “cowards”, “pleasers”;

b) I have a normal attitude;

c) I advise you not to rush into self-criticism in the future.

15. Is there criminal liability for persecuting critics?

c) I don’t know.

16. Which statement about criticism is closest to you?

a) criticism is medicine, you need to be able to apply and accept it;

b) management activity is also creativity, so let me be evaluated by those who are supposed to, and not by everyone who is not too lazy;

c) there is a fashion for criticism.

Determine the amount of points scored using the table.

No. of questions	Answer options			No. of questions	Answer options
	A	B	IN		A	B	IN
1	3	0	2	9	1	0	3
2	3	1	0	10	2	0	1
3	3	0	1	11	1	2	3
4	3	2	1	12	1	3	2
5	3	1	2	13	3	0	3
6	2	1	3	14	1	2	1
7	1	0	3	15	3	0	0
8	2	1	3	16	2	0	1

Decoding the Criticism Test

Individual task No. 15 – “How do you feel about criticism?”

8-18 points. Your attitude towards criticism is more negative than positive. You do not like it when people criticize you, and when criticizing others, you often lose your sense of proportion. In both cases, you are very emotional, easily excited, can flare up, and be harsh. You need to cultivate a certain “Stability Complex”, i.e. a sense of self-confidence, in the legitimacy of your actions and decisions, and for this you should actively increase your business level, without overestimating yourself, but also without belittling your merits.

19-32 points. You are tolerant of criticism and consider it an acceptable element of managerial life, without, however, overestimating its importance. Your behavior in the roles of the criticized and the criticizing can be characterized as “controlled emotionality” - you rarely “lose your temper.” At the same time, you are not alien to the feeling of resentment, the desire to “annoy” critics, to justify your mistakes.

33-46 points. You take criticism in a business-like manner, perceive it quite calmly, and courageously and openly admit your mistakes. Occasionally you are visited by a feeling of annoyance at criticism, however, you try to hide it. In critical speeches, you do not overdo it, do not try to justify yourself by blaming others. Good knowledge of your business, confidence that you are in the right place allow you not to worry about personal authority, but to remember only the benefits of the business.

The mood now is OK

FOR EACH QUESTION, CHECK THE MOST ACCEPTABLE ANSWER OPTION FOR YOU.

1. Do you consider criticism a method of eliminating shortcomings in the work of individuals or a team?

a) I consider criticism a necessary and normal element of the life of any team

b) criticism only complicates relationships in the team, so I don’t recognize it

c) criticism is acceptable, but its role should not be exaggerated and it should not be used frequently.

1. How do you deal with public criticism?

a) I consider such criticism to be an effective form of overcoming shortcomings

b) I believe that it is better to express existing statements to a person in private than in public

c) I prefer “behind the scenes” criticism, i.e. criticism “behind the scenes”, in an unofficial setting or expressed in a half-joking form.

1. Do you think it is possible to criticize your superiors?

a) of course

b) one should not undermine the authority of the leader, therefore it is unacceptable to publicly criticize the authorities

1. How do you feel about self-criticism?

a) I try to be objective towards myself and, if I see my shortcomings, I openly admit them, without waiting for others to point them out.

b) usually I am aware of my shortcomings, but I am in no hurry to criticize myself

c) there is no need to criticize yourself, since there are always enough people who want to scold you

1. When making critical remarks, do you try to express yourself softly, tactfully, correctly, so as not to offend the personality of the person being criticized?

a) yes, of course

b) no, I think that the more the personality of the person being criticized is affected, the more effective the criticism

c) everything depends on this very person: if she is very touchy, I take this into account, and if not, I am not particularly sensitive.

1. When making critical comments, do you try to “sweeten the pill” by pointing out the positive aspects in the activities of the object of criticism?

a) I usually try

b) I don’t see the point in this

c) if I don’t know the person being criticized well or I know that he is touchy, then I try.

1. Do you measure the amount of criticism, do you try to maintain some measure?

a) yes, I criticize for no more than one flaw

b) no, I usually express everything that, in my opinion, is bad in the activities of the object of criticism

c) I try to criticize only the subject of discussion

1. During your critical speech, do you make any proposals to correct the situation or limit yourself to pointing out existing shortcomings?

a) yes, I think that the one who criticizes must offer something, otherwise he has no right to criticize

b) no, I believe that the main thing is to expose the problem, point out the shortcomings, and how to eliminate them is up to the person being criticized

c) as a rule, constructive criticism is preferable, but even if it is difficult to offer anything, you still cannot hush up the shortcomings.

1. What is usually your first reaction to criticism?

a) I try to answer right away

b) I worry in silence, I avoid answering

c) I think about the criticism and am in no hurry to react, but if they ask for my opinion, I will not shy away from answering.

1. What behavior is most typical for you when responding to criticism?

a) as a rule, I try to acknowledge criticism, even if it is not objective in everything

b) I resort to the method of “defense against the contrary,” i.e. I criticize the critic

c) since criticism undermines my authority, I try to defend myself, deflect criticism, and point out mitigating objective circumstances.

1. Does criticism irritate you?

a) yes, as a rule

b) not very

c) depends on who reacts and how

1. Do you develop a feeling of hostility towards the person who criticizes you?

a) yes, as a rule

b) no, extremely rarely

c) yes, if the criticism is unfair or expressed in a harsh, offensive form

1. How do you continue to build your relationship with the person who criticizes you?

a) as before

b) I try, on occasion, to “reciprocate” or to infringe upon his interests in another way available to me.

c) I try not to come into contact with him for some time

1. How do you feel about those who criticize themselves?

a) I consider them opportunists, cowards, people-pleasers

b) I have a normal attitude, what’s special here?

c) I advise you not to rush into self-criticism in the future.

1. Is there criminal liability for harassing critics?

a) yes

b) no

c) I don’t know

1. Joke question: which of the following statements do you prefer?

a) criticism is a medicine, you need to be able to apply and accept it.

b) those who are impeccable themselves have the right to criticize

c) there is a fashion for criticism

DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF POINTS YOU SCORED ON THE ANSWER RATING SCALE.

1. A-3, B-0, B-2
2. A-3, B-1, B-0
3. A-3, B-0, B-1
4. A-3, B-2, B-1
5. A-3, B-1, B-2
6. A-2, B-1, B-3
7. A-1, B-0, B-3
8. A-2, B-1, B-3
9. A-1, B-0, B-3
10. A-2, B-0, B-1
11. A-1, B-2, B-3
12. A-1, B-3, B-2
13. A-3, B-0, B-3
14. A-1, B-2, V-1
15. A-3, B-0, B-0
16. A-2, B-0, B-1.

8-18 POINTS . Your attitude towards criticism is more negative than positive. You don’t like it when people criticize you, and when you criticize others, you lose your sense of proportion. In both cases, you are very emotional, easily excited, can flare up, and be harsh. You need to form a certain “stability complex” in yourself, i.e. a sense of self-confidence, the legitimacy of one’s actions and decisions, and for this one should actively develop communication skills, without overestimating oneself, but also without belittling one’s merits.

19-32 points . You tolerate criticism, considering it an acceptable element of business relationships, without, however, overestimating its importance. Your behavior in the roles of the criticized and the criticizing can be described as “controlled emotionality” - you rarely lose your temper. At the same time, you are not alien to the feeling of resentment, the desire to “annoy” critics, to justify your mistakes.

33-45 points . You take criticism in a business-like manner, take it quite calmly, and openly admit your mistakes. Occasionally you feel annoyed by criticism, but you try to hide it. In critical speeches, you do not overdo it, do not try to justify yourself by blaming others. A good knowledge of your merits allows you not to worry about your authority, but to remember only the benefits of the matter.