Princess Diana's clairvoyant made a sensational statement. A Japanese psychic published an interview with the spirit of Princess Diana who appeared to him. The appearance of a mysterious white Fiat

Dedicated to the life and work of the great fortuneteller Vanga.

In her book “The Truth about Vanga”, the niece of the fortuneteller Krasimira Stoyanova reveals the secrets of many previously unknown predictions. It is known that the Bulgarian clairvoyant often predicted events in the lives of world celebrities. One of them was princess Diana.

On the day when the world community welcomed the newlyweds of the royal family - Diana And Charles“Vanga saw the gloomy ending to this story. “This wedding will kill the girl,” she said clearly. “We will die together... she will hear about my death, but we will die together.” Both the fortune teller and Princess Diana died in August. Vanga died on August 11, 1996. Princess Diana was involved in a fatal car accident on August 31, 1997.

Wedding of Diana and Prince Charles. Photo: kinopoisk.ru

In the life of the princess, luck and misfortune constantly went hand in hand. She was lucky to get into the most famous family in Great Britain, but no one would call her personal life happy. She was the favorite of her people, but was not loved by her own husband. Diana could serve as a role model in the purity of her intentions, the nobility of her behavior and the humility with which she accepted all difficulties. But fate did not give her the opportunity to realize herself even in good deeds - Diana died in her prime.

After the car accident that killed Princess Diana and her lover Dodi al-Fayed, many rumors and speculations surfaced. It’s hard to say which of this is true and which is guesswork, but it became clear that for Lady Di herself and those around her, this death was not a complete surprise. Here are some mystical facts about the death of the princess.

1. After her divorce from Prince Charles in August 1996, Diana said that August was the most unlucky month for her, and most likely she would also die in August.

2. Princess's butler Paul Burrell quoted a letter from Lady Di, in which she once again and more specifically formulated her gloomy forebodings: “I have entered the most terrible phase of my life. Anything can happen now. For example, the brakes in my car malfunction, an accident and death. This will allow Charles to marry Camilla».

3. Together with Dodi, Diana flew to the British healer Rita Rogers 19 days before the tragic car accident.

4. Another clairvoyant - Simone Simons– diagnosed Diana with “black energy vortices” located on the left side (side of the heart) of the princess’s bed. According to the conclusion of a medical examination, Diana died from a broken heart.

5. The only surviving witness to the disaster Trevor Rhys-Jones doesn't remember anything.

There are many versions of the accident in which Princess Diana died, but one thing remains important - Vanga connected Diana’s death with her wedding to Prince Charles. It is unknown whether this is a coincidence, but it is clear that if Diana had not become a member of the royal family, things could have turned out differently.

Japanese psychic Riiho Okawa, who in his homeland heads a large-scale religious movement “ Happy Science“, on the 20th anniversary of the death of the British Princess Diana, published an interview that he allegedly took with the “lonely spirit” Lady Di he called a few weeks ago.

"Good afternoon. Are you Princess Diana?” - this is how the afterlife communication begins. "Yes. Yes,” comes the answer. “Did Diana ever say ‘uh-huh’ in an interview?” asked the Mirror, which published excerpts from Okawa’s extensive “questionnaire.”

Diana's spirit sympathizes with her daughter-in-law, Prince William's wife. “Catherine is very kind to me. I feel it,” she says about Kate Middleton. The ghostly Diana is far from being so disposed towards her ex-husband. When asked if she can forgive him, the spirit replies: “No, definitely not. No no no. I don't hate him, but I believe he is the devil." She also stated that her husband did not truly love her, did not value her mind and heart, and used her beauty as his accessory.

Regarding the car accident in which she died, the ghost princess said: “There was a car accident and I was taken to the hospital. After that I sleep, sleep, sleep, sleep, but I still live.” When asked if she believes she was murdered, Diana replies: “I'm not sure, but I feel evil intent... Perhaps the secret service or... Someone wanted to take my life after my divorce. Is this coming from Charles or... He could have sent his messenger of death.”

"What do you think of Queen Elizabeth?" - asks the medium. “About which?” the ghost asks a counter question, apparently hinting that in the history of the country there were two queens with that name. “About the mother of Prince Charles,” Riiho clarifies. “Ah, Elizabeth... Hmmm... Perhaps she is a good mother. But she is the last, the last light of England,” Diana says mysteriously. And then she prophesies that a new revolution is planned in the country and that royal power in Great Britain may soon end - it is possible that even before her eldest son William has the opportunity to ascend the throne.

“My tragedy is that this is a turning point. There is no truth. No love. There is no loyalty... I feel different from others. This is the reason why I prefer Islam,” states the spirit of Her Highness.

When Okawa tells Diana that she is dead and a ghost, she reacts violently: “Oh, no! Lord, No! Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no... I don't like ghosts. Oh, no, no, no, no, no... It's a dream, a dream, a dream, a bad dream, a bad dream... Of course, I have a grave, in England, but I don't live in this grave. I mean, dead people lie underground, but I’m not there, of course... You say 20 years have passed since my death, but I don’t understand my essence. Who am I? What am I? How should I live? Am I just sleeping or am I lying there like a dead man? Please enlighten me,” she turns to the Japanese.

The complete posthumous interview with Diana Okawa sells on Amazon.com for almost $10 a copy. And he claims that it is selling well.

On August 31, 1997, exactly 19 years ago, Princess Diana died.

When Diana died, her sons were still teenagers. William was 15 at the time, Harry was 13. But during his recent visit to one of the British hospitals, Prince William admitted: although years have passed since the death of his mother, not a day goes by that he does not remember her and miss her. And his brother Harry also admits: the pain from his mother’s death is still strong...

Many who cared about Diana could not come to terms with her passing - the tragedy cut her life short too suddenly. And, what is most surprising, there are still people who refuse to believe that her death was an accident. And some are completely sure: Diana is still alive!

The craziest theories are being built about what actually happened in the Alma tunnel back then. And we must admit that they do not arise entirely out of nowhere. After all, much of what is known about the tragedy actually looks very strange.

Here are the most inexplicable facts about this story.

Diana was taken to the hospital only an hour and a half after the accident

First of all, supporters of the conspiracy theory, as a result of which, as they believe, Diana died, refuse to believe that everything possible was really done to save the princess. The fact that a car crashed into the 13th support in the Pont de l’Alma tunnel became known at 12:26 p.m. And she was brought to the Pitie-Salpetriere hospital only at 2 hours 6 minutes. But the princess was alive for another 3.5 hours after the accident, and with more efficient medical care She might well have been saved.

The doctors made excuses by saying that many things were bothering them. For example, it took half an hour to remove the unfortunate Diana from the car. And this is extremely strange, considering the fact that she, like her boyfriend, was sitting in the back seat, and rear end The cars were the least damaged. Further: the transportation itself took an inordinately long time. First of all, the fact that, as the doctors claimed, several (!) hospitals located much closer to the hospital allegedly did not have the necessary equipment. In addition, the ambulance was driving extremely slowly for two reasons: firstly, because of traffic jams, and secondly, one of the doctors decided that driving fast could harm the wounded!

It is hard to believe that the resulting delay, which may have cost Diana her life, was accidental. Moreover, medical aviation did not appear yesterday, and when it comes to such important people as the princess, it is logical to expect that a helicopter will be called in to take her to the hospital in a matter of minutes. However, this did not happen.

Strange story with the car driver

According to the official version, Henri Paul, who was driving the ill-fated car, was recognized as the main culprit of the accident. Police said forensic tests determined he was highly intoxicated at the time of the crash. But here a number of questions arise. First of all, why did no one notice his condition that day and he was allowed to drive? But if you believe the tests, based on the level of alcohol in his blood, he should have drunk at least three bottles of strong wine that day. Such intoxication would be difficult to hide.

But the main problem was precisely the oddities with the analyzes. For some reason, the vial of blood allegedly taken from Paul was initially labeled as “blood of an unknown man.” Next: Abnormality found in dead driver's blood great content CO - in other words, carbon monoxide. And finally, the analysis revealed the presence of an anthelmintic drug, which Paul had never taken. As doctors have testified, it is usually prescribed to the homeless...

As a result, lovers of conspiracy theories came to the conclusion: the blood transferred to the laboratory for research was taken from another person, whose corpse was in the morgue at that moment. Perhaps from a “homeless man” who committed suicide using carbon monoxide. What was the purpose of this whole hoax? It’s very simple: to shift the blame for the incident onto the supposedly “out of the blue” drunk driver...

Mysterious flash of white light

Another strange story is related to the fact that one of the drivers of another car, which was also in the tunnel at the time of the accident, saw a strange flash of blinding white light in the mirror - just before the crash. The witness's name was Francois Levistre, and he tried to explain to the investigator that the driver of Diana's car was specially blinded so that he would lose control of the car. Alas, the police did not believe a single word of Francois, since he had problems with the law in the past. As the law enforcement officers reasoned, since he was once accused of theft and forgery of checks, his testimony cannot be trusted. True, there was another witness who supported Levistra’s testimony - American tourist Brian Anderson. But after a short time, for some reason, he retracted his words...

The seat belts in the car were faulty

Another unclear point: the passengers were not wearing seat belts at the time of the accident. But Diana always manically ensured that both she and her loved ones followed these basic safety precautions. But it turned out that she simply could not buckle up that day, because the belts of the luxury Mercedes did not work. But shortly before the incident, the car underwent technical inspection and was found to be in good working order! Could such a sudden breakdown be accidental?

The appearance of a mysterious white Fiat

As a forensic study showed, on the side of the car in which the princess died, traces of a collision with another car were found, which, according to the police, was why the Mercedes crashed into a support. Traces of paint were identified, and it was established that Diana's car collided sideways with a white Fiat of a certain model. The problem is that for some reason this car was never found, although the police seemed to have done everything possible. True, one similar car was found: it belonged to James Adanson, a photographer and, allegedly, an employee of the British intelligence MI6. But Adanson was provided with an alibi by his wife, who stated that he spent that day with her, and allegedly did not leave their car garage. And the fact that corresponding damage was found on his car was later refuted. A few months later, Adanson was found dead under suspicious circumstances. The death was ruled a suicide. But a hole in his temple was discovered, and the weapon with which he allegedly killed himself was never found...

If we take into account all of the above, or at least some of the facts that seem suspicious, then we can indeed come to the conclusion that Diana was killed and did not die as a result of an accidental accident. What are the possible culprits behind her untimely death?

Royal family

The first and most important version: Diana was killed on the orders of one of the members of the ruling dynasty. Someone suspected the spouse queen elizabeth, Duke of Edinburgh. They claimed that he had heard rumors about the princess’s soon-planned engagement to Dodi, the son of the millionaire, a famous figure in the Muslim movement, Mohammed Al-Fayed. And the queen’s husband could not come to terms with the fact that the mother of William, the heir to the throne, would become the wife of such a man. In addition, there were rumors that Diana was already pregnant with Dodi’s child. And this turn of events - that the princes would grow up with Al Fayed's son - turned out to be completely unacceptable.

Others - and there are many more of them - believe that the order could have been given ex-husband Diana - Prince Charles. Indirect confirmation of this version is the fact that Diana herself spoke about this shortly before her death. In one of her letters, she said: “I am afraid that my ex-husband Charles is planning to kill me!”

How could Diana interfere so much with Charles, who at that time was already officially divorced from her? There was one subtlety. Queen Elizabeth, who for a long time did not hide her dislike for Camilla Parker-Bowles, directly told her son that she would not allow his new marriage to his still-living, albeit ex-wife.

And finally, there was one more argument that could push Charles or his relatives to organize an assassination attempt on the princess. The fact is that, as they claimed, Diana not only planned to get engaged to Dodi, she wanted to go with him to America forever and take William and Harry with her. But it was impossible to allow both heirs to leave the country...

Enemies of Mohamed Al-Fayed

A much less popular version is that Diana became not the main, but a “collateral” victim. That is, the enemies of Al-Fayed Sr. decided to deal him a fatal blow by killing his son. And Diana, unfortunately, just happened to be nearby... Of course, such a rich and influential person Like Mohamed, there were many dangerous enemies. But which of them was so angry as to conceive such a crime, the conspiracy theorists never figured out.

Everything was staged

And finally, the craziest version. Some of the fans, especially those who loved Diana, refused to believe that the princess was dead. A theory was put forward that the princess faked her death. In fact, neither she nor Dodi were in the crashed car that day. And the bodies found belonged to a pair of their doubles. This was done to escape the inevitable assassination attempt. Supporters of this version also have a very popular assumption that Diana was pregnant with Dodi’s child. And that it was for the sake of this child that Diana allegedly sacrificed fame, position in society and even the peace of mind of William and Harry. This version is the most convenient, it allows you to weave anything into the story: the participation of the special services, the pressure of the Windsors, the insidious plan of the Al-Fayeds to raise Diana’s child and then, with his help, usurp the throne...

Life is more amazing than any movie. The tragic death of Diana is the very case when the truth is somewhere in the middle. It is unlikely that we will ever know the whole truth. And is she really needed if the Queen of Hearts is still alive in the memory of a huge number of people?

20 years have passed since the tragic death of Princess Diana in Paris. Much water has passed under the bridge since then: her ex-husband Prince Charles eventually married his mistress Camilla Parker Bowles, and her sons Prince William and Prince Harry grew up and continued their mother’s work - taking up charitable projects around the world. Many fans of Lady Di often think about how the fate of the heirs to the British throne would have developed if, on that fateful August night, a disaster had not claimed the life of the “Queen of Hearts.” Would Diana have approved of William's marriage to a girl from a non-aristocratic family? Would she like American actress Meghan Markle, who seems to have every chance of becoming the wife of 32-year-old Harry? These and other questions were recently answered by Simone Simmons, a clairvoyant and close friend of Diana. According to Simmons, the Princess of Wales still gets in touch with her and discusses topics that concern her.

Almost 20 years ago, one of the most beloved representatives of the British royal family, Princess Diana, passed away. During her lifetime, the slender blonde with a languid gaze was a real mystery, which many are still trying to solve. Only a few people knew who Lady Di really was. She trusted her secrets only to a select circle of people close to her, which for more than four years included the British clairvoyant and healer Simone Simmons.

The Princess of Wales and the medium met in the early nineties at an alternative medicine clinic. The women quickly became close and began to meet almost every day, and could also communicate with each other on the phone 10 hours a day. Diana shared with Simone everything that worried her. Moreover, Lady Di quite calmly discussed with her friend the details of her personal life, which media workers often reinterpreted in their own way. According to Ms. Simmons, their friendship with ex-wife Prince Charles was so strong that Diana continues to communicate with her to this day - from the other world.

Kate Middleton VS Meghan Markle

Recently, Simone Simmons, who dedicated several biographical books to Princess Diana, decided to remind journalists from the British edition of The Daily Mail how much Miss Spencer had previously been attached to her. The clairvoyant claims that Lady Di to this day discusses with her current events taking place in the country (according to the medium, the Princess of Wales is seriously concerned about Brexit issues, and believes that it will only benefit Great Britain), as well as the personal life of her beloved sons.

“We had no taboo topics: we discussed absolutely everything. Surprisingly, I can still hear it. It is very strange. She talks to me about the situation in the world, and also that she loves her little grandchildren George and Charlotte very much,” Simmons told reporters.

By the way, Princess Diana treats her daughter-in-law Kate Middleton very well. Simone claims that Lady Di fully approves of the choice of her eldest son. She is not embarrassed that the wife of her heir was born into a non-aristocratic family without a hint of a title. “Catherine is the perfect match for William. She is very pleased with her daughter-in-law. True, Diana used to worry that Kate was too thin, but now everything is great,” said the clairvoyant.

And if William’s wife suits Diana in all respects, then the current passion of his younger brother pleases her much less. Apparently, Lady Di is not happy with the fact that Harry is dating divorced American actress Meghan Markle - allegedly she is not at all suitable for him either in status or character.

“She told me she wanted Harry to be with a woman she could rely on because he was a very sensitive and vulnerable young man. He had many lovers, but keeping him is not an easy task. Some time ago, Diana told me the name of the girl who was perfect for him. Dee told me that Harry knew right away that his girlfriend was the one. Unfortunately, their relationship did not work out because his chosen one could not withstand the pressure from his family and the increased public attention to herself,” recounted the words of her titled friend Simone Simmons.

Personal experiences

The Princess of Wales also reflects on her love affairs from time to time. According to Simone Simmons, Diana never loved billionaire and playboy Dodi al-Fayed, who died in a car accident with her. Allegedly, Lady Di and Dodi were exclusively connected friendly relations and she, being a person with very kind hearted, I just wanted to help him understand himself.

“Men like Dodi were never attracted to Diana. I’m sure there was nothing serious between them,” the clairvoyant said.

According to a British woman with psychic abilities, the “queen of hearts” was in love with heart surgeon Hasnat Khan for the last couple of years of her life. One of the few who knew about this was, of course, Simone: “Diana had a favorite type. She couldn't resist smart and caring men. She carefully hid her affairs, so her relationship with Hasnat was a secret for two years.”

After her high-profile divorce from Prince Charles, Diana was confident that she could live a normal life. She even planned to move with Hasnat to another country and give birth to a baby. However, the talented surgeon did not agree to such an adventure and left her completely.

Oddly enough, it was after the break with Mr. Khan that Diana improved her relationship with Charles. Simone insists that her friend continued to have tender feelings for the heir to the British throne even after breaking up with him.

“She loved Charles until the day she died. Of course, Diana was angry with him, but she never stopped loving him. After the rift with Hasnat, she even assumed that she and ex-husband there is every chance of a reunion. However, Camilla would not allow this. In 1996, Diana even asked Charles to “make Parker Bowles an honest woman” and marry her,” the clairvoyant said.

According to Simmons, the marriage of Queen Elizabeth II's eldest son and his first wife would never have ended if Diana had been five or six years older. Lady Di was too young and naive when she got married.

“This is not an accident,” Mohammed Al-Fayed publicly declared after learning of the death of his son Dodi and his beloved Princess Diana, “It was all a set-up. And it was murder." The words of a parent crushed by grief could be attributed to a state of passion, but from August 31, 1997, the Egyptian billionaire stubbornly stood his ground for almost fifteen years. After all, he had facts on his side - strange, inconvenient for the official investigation, confusing the entire chain of events of that night and for some reason not taken into account by anyone.

Officially, Diana was investigated twice - in France (in 1999) and in the UK (in 2008). Both of them came to disappointing and rather superficial conclusions. They can be summarized as follows: the tragedy occurred due to the extremely careless driving of Henri Paul (the driver of the Mercedes), in whose blood alcohol was found, due to faulty seat belts, as well as due to the irresponsible behavior of the paparazzi, because of which Monsieur Paul had to exceed the speed limit.

Meanwhile, after more than 20 years, enough data has accumulated, as well as different hypotheses, confirming that the scenario for the accident in the Alma Bridge tunnel may not have been at all what French and British investigators presented it as. All of them are intended to prove that Diana’s death was not accidental and lies on the conscience of the highest British circles (including the royal family). Lady Di knew too much and behaved too irresponsibly.

The number of such theories has long exceeded a hundred, but we have selected the most interesting of them - from those that have a right to exist to those that are absolutely fantastic. And at the same time they told how they were “fended off” by the official investigation.

Henri Paul was not drunk and was on an MI6 mission that night

Typically, the first person to come under the microscope during an accident investigation is the driver. This happened that time too. Henri died on the spot, and when the French investigation announced that the level of alcohol in the blood of the princess's driver was three times higher than the norm, the conclusion seemed so implausible to everyone that many immediately began to guess what was really behind this statement.

Indeed, could Diana, her bodyguard Trevor Rhys-Jones and Dodi Al-Fayed actually put themselves at risk and get into a car driven by a man who, according to British investigators, had drunk at least 5 glasses of Ricard aperitif?

Thus, thoughts arose that Henri did not actually consume alcohol that night, and the official version was fabricated only to hide the fact that he served in MI6. They say that British intelligence instructed him to set up an accident and thus kill the princess and her lover, and since Henri himself could not escape, the investigation came up with a story that he was drunk.

Meanwhile, an investigation by the London Metropolitan Police did not reveal any evidence that Henri Paul actually worked for British special agents. The fact of a single bribe of a Frenchman was also excluded, because the chances of surviving such an accident for an unprepared person are zero. Moreover, the Metropolitan Police established that that night Henri Paul had no idea that he would have a night shift with Diana and Dodi. His work day ended at 7 pm, and only a couple of hours later he received a call from the Ritz hotel service with instructions to take high-ranking clients to a restaurant.

By the way, Dodi Al-Fayed changed the restaurant at the very last moment (since the previous one was already crowded with paparazzi). Accordingly, the route changed. So it was certainly impossible for the driver to plan a competent operation to eliminate the princess that night - there was too little data.

As for the alcohol in the blood, several more tests later confirmed that Monsieur Paul had indeed drunk more than the legal limit that night, which, in principle, is quite consistent with the fact that his shift came to an end long before his called for overtime work. Meanwhile, the question of why no one from the Ritz service or Mercedes passengers smelled the smell of alcohol from the driver and trusted him to drive the princess remains open.

By the way, Diana’s bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones was also accused of working for MI6, but he survived, but did not remember any details due to a traumatic brain injury. According to the version presented by former British intelligence officer Richard Tomlinson, his physical fitness fully allowed him to survive the accident, and the “fabricated” amnesia served as an excellent tool for not counting on him as a witness.

Diana was killed by the royal family because she was pregnant by a Muslim.

This version is also defended by Mohammed Al-Fayed. In his opinion, the information about his ex-daughter-in-law’s affair with a Muslim angered him so much royal family(they say the mother of the future king cannot connect her life with a representative of the Islamic faith), that some of its representatives - primarily Prince Philip and Diana's sister Lady Sarah McCorquodale - decided to intervene. Moreover, according to the testimony of Dodi’s father and some servants from his villa, Diana was expecting a child from her lover, and on September 1, the couple, along with the news of their engagement, were going to announce this as well.

A bastard born to the mother of the future king of Great Britain from a Muslim - this would be too much for the British royalties

Metropolitan Police presented several counterarguments to Mohammed's accusations. Firstly, by this time Diana had already mastered the art of communicating with the press, and it was not her style to talk about such high-profile news from her life without prior preparation. No preparations were made for a possible press conference at that time.

On August 30, Dodi Al-Fayed actually visited the Alberto Rossi jewelry boutique, however, judging by the recordings from CCTV cameras, he only left (!) with a catalog. Particularly meticulous ones calculated: Diana and Dodi knew each other for only seven weeks, and judging by the schedules of both, they spent no more than 23 days together - not the most respectable period for announcing an engagement. And in order to scare the royal family, because Diana had previously met with a representative of the Muslim faith.

His name was Hasnat Khan. He worked as a cardiologist in a London hospital and dated the princess for two years. Then Diana seriously thought about connecting her life with a Pakistani doctor and changing her religion for his sake, and, as the investigation found out, even Prince Charles gave her his blessing for this marriage. And how could it be otherwise? After all, despite their separation, the Prince of Wales still could not reunite with his beloved Camilla, and Diana’s potential happiness could well save him from popular hatred and give him a chance for a quiet life with the woman he loves.

As for Diana’s pregnancy, Mohammed announced it only in 2001 - you must agree, it’s too important information, to conceal it for three and a half years (of course, only if this is not another ploy to reopen the investigation). But, despite the skepticism, investigators checked this version as well. The princess's blood test for hCG was negative. In addition, judging by the testimony of her friends, Diana did not seek to marry Dodi and carefully monitored contraception.

On the other hand, the version that they got rid of Diana for being too amorous continued to grow stronger in people’s minds. During court hearings in 2007, Mohammed Al-Fayed's representative Michael Mansfield read to the jury a list of Diana's alleged lovers, based on the testimony of the princess's private secretary, Michael Gibbons. There were four names in the “Mansfield list”, and it ended with an ironic “and so on...”, which hinted that in fact the number of Lady Di’s men cannot be adequately calculated (read also: Princess Diana’s Favorite Men). In any other situation, such information could have played against the Princess of Wales, but this time it became part of the accusation against the royal family and the British authorities and is presented as a possible motive for the murder of Lady Spencer.

Diana was killed by a journalist (and he also worked for British intelligence)

Another “mystical” story floating around about the Parisian tragedy is connected with an old white Fiat Uno, whose traces were discovered by forensic scientists at the scene of the collision of the Mercedes in which the princess was. According to eyewitnesses, the Fiat was indeed in the tunnel, but after the accident the car instantly disappeared from the “crime scene”... and was no longer found within Paris (or was it poorly looked for?).

Suspicion immediately fell on the French photographer James Andonson, who had previously photographed the couple at the Al-Fayed villa in Saint-Tropez and owned exactly the same white Fiat. According to Dodi’s father, the accident could have happened because Andonson’s car “cut off” the Mercedes, as a result of which the driver lost control and crashed into the tunnel wall.

Andonson himself completely denied his involvement in the tragedy. According to him, he had not used the car for a long time, and it was not in the right condition (it was already in its ninth year) to catch up and “cut off” the Mercedes, which was racing at a speed of about 150 kilometers per hour. And the investigation agreed with him. Soon, however, the journalist rushed to urgently sell his Fiat, but this did not arouse suspicion. Traces of Mercedes paint were still not found on Andonson’s car.

Meanwhile, Mohammed stood his ground. Intelligence could well have bribed a photographer with extensive experience in spying on people to push the princess's car to the side just a little. His life, unlike the same Henri Paul, was practically not in danger.

The real car was never found, Andonson had some kind of alibi (his wife confirmed that on the night of the accident he was with her in Linieres, 177 miles from Paris, but, as is known, spouses do not testify against each other), so that the photographer was soon forgotten. And they remembered only three years later - in May 2000, when his incinerated body was found in a car parked in the middle of the forest. Investigators found a bullet mark in the back of his head and, based on testimony from friends, that Andonson’s work in last weeks He was very depressed, and the verdict was quickly returned - “suicide.”

However, the photographer’s family hastened to refute the words of his friends, saying that Andonson, on the contrary, had recently been in good spirits, and demanded that an investigation into the murder be carried out. Mohammed Al-Fayed agreed with them, as well as the conspiracy theorists who supported him, who put forward the version that the photographer’s “suicide” was the work of MI6, who removed an inconvenient witness.

The intelligence services killed Diana themselves (without anyone's help)

In fact, conspiracy theorists have still not decided whose intelligence - Great Britain, France or the USA - took care of the elimination of the Princess of Wales. In any case, supporters of this theory have no doubt that special agents are to blame for Diana’s death. In their opinion, for the secret services to arrange such an accident is a simple matter. You just need to prepare the scenery and props in advance.

The first thing that raised questions among the investigation after the accident was the unscheduled replacement of the princess’s Mercedes. The fact is that all day on August 31, Diana and Dodi were driving another car, but in the evening, technical employees suddenly found some kind of mystical breakdown in the car and took it away for repairs. Instead, the Ritz guests were given another Mercedes, which, by the way, also had its own faults (the car had already been in an accident before) - for example, the seat belts did not work, and for some reason only in the rear seats, where Diana was located with lover. The princess, by the way, as her acquaintances testify, was always very scrupulous about her safety, so if the belts had worked, she would probably have buckled up and (who knows?), maybe even survived. After all, the death of Diana’s fastened guard has passed.

Due to the fact that the car had already suffered an accident, the driver was prohibited from reaching a speed of more than 60 kilometers per hour, but, as luck would have it, that night the princess’s Mercedes was overtaken by the paparazzi (by the way, according to one of the same theories, these were not photographers, and hired killers, so that if plan “A” fails, they can complete the mission), and you can’t tear yourself away from them at such a modest speed.

Finally, the culmination of the operation is the car entering a tunnel in which none of the 14 cameras are working. The latter is explained by the fact that surveillance in this area is controlled not by the police or private owners, but by the Paris Urban Transport Society, an organization that closes at 11 pm. The cameras remain on, but they do not record anything, and the only chance to see what is happening is to make sure there is a person sitting in front of the monitor. There was no such person that night.

They “help” the driver to lose control: first they cut him off (which has been definitely proven), and then they blind him with a bright flash of light (this was confirmed by witnesses). This technique, as former MI6 officer Richard Tomlinson later told investigators, is a favorite technique of the intelligence services. According to him, intelligence invented this method specifically for the assassination of Yugoslav leader Slobodan Milosevic in 1992. Although later the Metropolitan Police, to which the intelligence service kindly opened the doors of its offices specifically to check the testimony of its former employee, denied Mr. Tomlinson’s words. It turned out that the British had no plans to assassinate Milosevic (as the former agent himself later admitted). The police then found a project to assassinate another Serbian politician, but there were no hints of the use of a flash.

Meanwhile, eyewitnesses admitted that there was an outbreak. But what was missing was an ambulance that quickly arrived at the scene of the accident. Doctors were then called at 12:26 at night, but Princess Diana was delivered to the hospital only at 2:06 - too slow for such a high-ranking patient. And quite suspicious.

That night they wanted to kill Dodi, not Diana

One of the most implausible theories, but still it was put forward by conspiracy theorists for consideration. According to this hypothesis, the "#1 target" that night was not Diana, but Mohammed Al-Fayed. More precisely, his son, by killing whom, the enemies of the Egyptian billionaire could settle scores with him. Diana's death was only a cover for the operation, so that the police would not even think about involving the businessman's ill-wishers as witnesses.

A few years before the tragedy, Mohammed actually managed to make enemies for himself. He fought to acquire the London department store Harrods, was convicted of illegally financing British conservatives, and was also involved in several criminal cases on suspicion of embezzlement and fraud.

The Egyptian businessman always avoided justice, but, according to some conspiracy theorists, his enemies could well take revenge on him on their own - by arranging an accident for his heir in a Paris tunnel.

Diana faked her death and now lives happily away from prying eyes

And for dessert - the most fantastic theory of Diana’s death, which, however, also has its followers. According to her, the Princess of Wales deliberately faked her own death in order to start new life away from the paparazzi, the royal court and fans.

Several facts prompted this idea for some conspiracy theorists. Firstly, some time before the tragedy, Diana more than once admitted to her associates that they wanted to kill her - and precisely by organizing the accident. Such evidence is available, for example, from the princess’s butler Paul Barella, to whom Diana sent a letter back in 1993 in which she admitted that she foresaw her death. In her opinion, it should have been an accident that would open the way for Charles to marry... no, not with Camilla. Then Lady Di was sure that her husband was cheating on her with their children’s nanny, Tiggy Legg-Brook. But that's not what we're talking about now.

Perhaps this is how Diana prepared the ground for her own “death” and this is how she set up Charles, whom she hated? Well, the script looks like a high-quality thriller, but is still difficult to execute outside of the stage.

Secondly, supporters of this theory complain that no one has ever shown the princess’s body to the general public. Her body was buried in a closed coffin, and only a few had a chance to see her in the last minutes before she went to the secluded Spencer Island in Northamptonshire.

Yes, knowing the eccentric character of the Princess of Wales, such an idea could well have occurred to her. But so that she begins to implement it? This scenario is only suitable for crazy conspiracy theories.