What is known about Bigfoot. Is Bigfoot Real

Of great interest is the Yeti or big Foot. Various rumors have been circulating about this creature for several decades. Who is Yeti? Scientists can only guess, since it is very difficult to prove its existence due to lack of facts.

Eyewitnesses who met a strange creature describe in detail its fearsome appearance:

In addition, scientists had a chance to study the size of the monster's legs from the prints left on the snow or the ground. Also, eyewitnesses provided shreds of wool found in the thickets through which the yeti made its way, drew it from memory, tried to photograph it.

Direct evidence

It is impossible to determine with accuracy who a Bigfoot is. When approaching it, people begin to feel dizzy, their consciousness changes and their blood pressure rises. Creatures act on the energy of a person in such a way that they are simply not noticed. In addition, yeti instill animal fear in all living beings. When he approaches, there is complete silence around: the birds fall silent, and the animals run away.

Numerous attempts to film the creature on a video camera turned out to be practically fruitless. Even if they succeeded, the pictures and videos were of very poor quality, despite the high-quality equipment. This is due not only to the fact that yetis move too fast, despite their huge growth and dense physique, but also to the fact that technology, as well as people, begins to fail. Attempts to catch up with the fleeing "man" did not bring success.

Those who wanted to photograph the yeti say that when you try to look into his eyes, a person ceases to control himself. Accordingly, pictures are simply not taken, or foreign objects are visible on them.

Fact. Eyewitnesses from different parts of the planet describe beings either female or male. This suggests that Bigfoot most likely reproduces in the usual way.

Who is Bigfoot really is not clear. Either this is an alien creature, or an individual from antiquity, who miraculously managed to live up to our time. Or maybe this is the result of experiments conducted between humans and primates.

Where does Bigfoot live?

Tibetan ancient records have an encounter narrative Buddhist monks and a huge hairy monster on two legs. From Asian languages, the word "yeti" is translated as "someone who lives among the stones."

Fact: the first information about Bigfoot appeared in print in the 50s of the last century. The authors of these texts were climbers who tried to conquer Everest. The meeting with the yeti took place in the Himalayan forests, in which there are paths leading to the top of the mountain.

The places where the mystical creature lives are forests and mountains. Bigfoot in Russia was first recorded in the Caucasus. Eyewitnesses claim that as soon as they saw a huge primate, he disappeared right before their eyes, leaving behind a small cloud of haze.

Przhevalsky, who was studying the Gobi Desert, encountered the Yeti back in the 19th century. But further research was stopped due to the refusal of the state to allocate money for the expedition. This was influenced by the clergy, who considered the yeti a creature from hell.

After that, Bigfoot was seen in Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and other places. In 2012, a hunter from the Chelyabinsk region encountered a humanoid creature. Despite the strong fear, he managed to film the monster on his mobile phone. Then the Yeti was seen many times near the settlements. But his approach to people has not yet found an explanation.

Despite the fact that no one can tell who the Yeti is, . This is supported not only by weak facts, but also by faith, which is sometimes stronger than all evidence.

Bigfoot (yeti, sasquatch, bigfoot, enji, avdoshka, almast English bigfoot) is a legendary humanoid creature allegedly found in various high-altitude or forest regions of the Earth. Its existence is claimed by many enthusiasts, but has not yet been confirmed. It is believed that this is a relic hominid, that is, a mammal belonging to the order of primates and the genus of man, which has survived to this day from prehistoric times.

A still from Roger Patterson's video.

Currently, there is not a single representative of the species living in captivity, not a single skeleton or skin. However, there are allegedly hair, footprints and dozens of photographs, videos (poor quality) and audio recordings. The reliability of this evidence is in doubt. For a long time, one of the most compelling pieces of evidence has been a short film directed by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin in 1967 in Northern California. The footage was said to be of a female Bigfoot. However, in 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, for whom this shooting was made, there were testimonies of his relatives and acquaintances who said (however, without presenting any physical evidence) that the whole story with the "American Yeti" was from the beginning to the end is rigged; forty-centimeter "Yeti footprints" were made by artificial forms, and the filming was a staged episode with a man in a specially tailored monkey suit .

Bigfoot he was named after a group of climbers who conquered Everest. They discovered the loss of food supplies, then heard a heart-rending scream, and on one of the snow-covered slopes a chain of footprints similar to human ones appeared. The residents explained that it was a Yeti, a terrible bigfoot, and categorically refused to camp in this place. Since then, Europeans have called this creature Bigfoot.

The testimonies of encounters with "bigfoot" most often feature creatures that are different from modern man a denser build, a pointed skull, longer arms, a short neck and a massive lower jaw, relatively short hips, with thick hair covering all over the body - black, red, white or gray-haired. Dark faces. The hair on the head is longer than on the body. The mustache and beard are very sparse and short. They are good at climbing trees. It has been suggested that mountain populations Bigfoot live in caves, forest build nests on tree branches. Carl Linnaeus designated it as Homo troglodytes (caveman). Very fast. He can overtake a horse, moreover, on two legs, and in the water - a motor boat. Omnivorous, but prefers plant foods, very fond of apples. Eyewitnesses described encounters with specimens of various heights, from the average human to 3 m or more.

Most modern scientists are skeptical about the possibility of the existence of Bigfoot.

... about Bigfoot, he said: "I really want to believe, but there is no reason." The words "no evidence" mean that the matter was studied, and as a result of the study it was found that there is no reason to trust the original statements. This: is the formula of the scientific approach: “I want to believe”, but since “there are no grounds”, then this belief must be abandoned.

Academician A. B. Migdal From conjecture to truth.

The image of a huge scary man can reflect the innate fears of darkness, the unknown, relationships with mystical forces among different peoples. It is possible that in some cases people with unnatural hair or feral people were mistaken for Bigfoot.

The USSR was the only country in the world where the problem of finding the Yeti was considered at the highest state level. The Academy of Sciences of the USSR also showed interest in Bigfoot. On January 31, 1957, a meeting of the Presidium of the Academy of Sciences took place in Moscow. There was only one item on the agenda: “About Bigfoot.” In 1958, the Commission of the Academy of Sciences was established to study the issue of Bigfoot. It included well-known scientists - geologist, corresponding member S. V. Obruchev, primatologist and anthropologist M.F. Nesturkh, botanist K.V. The working hypothesis that guided the commission was that Bigfoot is a primate from a degraded branch of the Neanderthals that has survived to this day.The work of the commission was soon curtailed, but the results of its work were not canceled by subsequent studies of the USSR Academy of Sciences and the Russian Academy of Sciences. which the commission proceeded from, was later set forth in the official reference manuals of the Academy by N. F. Reimers and other authors.

Commission members J.-M. I. Kofman and Professor B.F. Porshnev and other enthusiasts continued to actively search for the Bigfoot or its traces.

In 1987, through the efforts of J.-M. I. Kofman and other enthusiasts of the search for Bigfoot, the Russian Association of Cryptozoologists, or the Society of Cryptozoologists, was established. The society had official status under the USSR Ministry of Culture and received a lot of help from the Komsomolskaya Pravda newspaper, which financed the purchase of night vision devices, communications equipment, photographic equipment, immobilization medicines, and provided support to local authorities. The society continues its work, publications of its members are published.

Numerous images of creatures similar to Bigfoot are known (on art objects Ancient Greece, Rome, Ancient Armenia, Carthage and the Etruscans and medieval Europe) and mentions, folklore of different peoples (faun, satire is strong in Ancient Greece, yeti in Tibet, Nepal and Bhutan, ghoul baths in Azerbaijan, chuchunny, chuchunaa in Yakutia, almas in Mongolia, zhen, maozhen and zhenxiong in China, kiik-adam and albasty in Kazakhstan, goblin, shish and shishiga among Russians, divas in Persia (and Ancient Rus'), Chugaister in Ukraine, virgins and albasty in the Pamirs, shurale and yarymtyk among the Kazan Tatars and Bashkirs, arsuri among the Chuvash, Piceni among the Siberian Tatars, abnauayu in Abkhazia, sasquatch in Canada, teryk, girkychavylyin, myrygdy, kiltan, arynk, arysa, rakkem, julia in Chukotka, sweet potato, sedapa and orangpendek in Sumatra and Kalimantan, agogwe, kakundakari and quilomba in Africa, etc.).

In folklore, they appear in the form of satyrs, demons, devils, goblin, water, mermaids, etc.

Russian zoologist K. A. Satunin claimed that in 1899 he saw a female byabang-guli in the Talysh mountains. In 1921, the existence of the yeti was reported by Howard-Bury, a famous climber who led an expedition to Everest. In the 20s of the XX century in Central Asia allegedly several yeti were caught, imprisoned in a zindan and, after unsuccessful interrogations and torture, they were shot like basmachi. The lieutenant colonel of the medical service of the Soviet Army V. S. Karapetyan in 1941 allegedly made a direct examination of a living wild man caught in Dagestan, the animal was soon shot and eaten. Evidence of this incident has not been preserved, since soon Karapetyan and his accomplices were shot as spies. In total, several hundred reports of Bigfoot sightings were recorded in the 20th century.

For capturing Bigfoot Governor Kemerovo region Aman Tuleev promises 1,000,000 rubles.

Among those who believe in the existence of Bigfoot, the most popular version is that he is a descendant of certain hominids who had a large stature or a stocky physique. Among the candidates:

Gigantopithecus- a probable relative of orangutans;

meganthrope- large anthropoid monkey of the Pleistocene;
Neanderthal- a species of Homo with a stocky physique and the longest lingering in the mountainous regions of Europe.

A fragment from the Soviet comedy feature film "Man from Nowhere" filmed by director Eldar Ryazanov in 1961 at the Mosfilm studio.

Description

In testimonies about meetings with "snow people" most often appear creatures that differ from modern humans in a denser physique, pointed skull, longer arms, short necks and massive lower jaws, relatively short hips, with thick hair all over body - black, red, white or gray. Dark faces. The hair on the head is longer than on the body. The mustache and beard are very sparse and short. They are good at climbing trees. It has been suggested that mountain populations of snow people live in caves, forest people build nests on tree branches. Carl Linnaeus referred to it as Homo troglodytes(caveman). Very fast. He can overtake a horse, moreover, on two legs, and in the water - a motor boat. Omnivorous, but prefers plant foods, very fond of apples. Eyewitnesses described encounters with specimens of various heights, from the average human to 3 m or more.

Ideas about Bigfoot and its various local counterparts are very interesting from the point of view of ethnography. The image of a huge scary man can reflect the innate fears of darkness, the unknown, relationships with mystical forces among different peoples. It is possible that in some cases Bigfoot people with unnatural hairline or feral people were accepted.

origin of name

Bigfoot called him thanks to a group of climbers who conquered Everest. They discovered the loss of food supplies, then heard a heart-rending scream, and on one of the snow-covered slopes a chain of footprints similar to human ones appeared. The residents explained that it was a Yeti, a terrible bigfoot, and categorically refused to camp in this place. Since then, Europeans have called this creature Bigfoot.

Existence

Most modern scientists are skeptical about the possibility of the existence of Bigfoot.

... about Bigfoot, he said: "I really want to believe, but there is no reason." The words "no evidence" mean that the matter was studied, and as a result of the study it was found that there is no reason to trust the original statements. This: is the formula of the scientific approach: “I want to believe”, but since “there are no grounds”, then this belief must be abandoned.
Academician A. B. Migdal From conjecture to truth.

The attitude of a professional biologist to the question of the possibility of the existence of a "snowman" was illustrated by paleontologist Kirill Eskov in a popular article:

I, at least, are not aware of the laws of nature that would impose a direct ban on the existence in the mountains of Central Asia of a relic hominoid - "monkey man", or simply a large great ape. It must be assumed that, contrary to its name, it is not connected with eternal snows in any way (except that it sometimes leaves traces there), but should live in the belt of mountain forests, where there is enough food and shelters. It is clear that any reports about the North American "bigfoot" can be thrown away without reading with a clear conscience (because there are no and never have been any species of primates on that continent, and in order to get there from Asia through the polar Beringia, as people did, you must at least have fire), but in the Himalayas or the Pamirs - why not? There are even quite plausible candidates for this role, for example, megantrop - a very large (about two meters tall) fossil ape from South Asia, which had a number of "human" features that bring it closer to African Australopithecus, the direct ancestors of hominids […]
So, do I admit (as a professional zoologist) the fundamental possibility of the existence of a relic hominoid? - answer: "Yes". Do I believe in its existence? - answer: "No". And since we are talking here not about “I know / I don’t know”, but about “I believe / I don’t believe”, I will allow myself to express a completely subjective judgment on this subject, based personal experience: […] where once the foot of a professional has set foot, not a single animal larger than a rat has a single chance to remain “unknown to science”. Well, since by the end of the twentieth century there were no more places where that professional foot would not have set foot at all (at least on land) - draw your own conclusions ...

- "Cryptus, sir!", Article. Kirill Eskov, Computerra, 13.03.07, No. 10 (678): pp. 36-39.

Currently, there is not a single representative of the species living in captivity, not a single skeleton or skin. However, there are allegedly hair, footprints and dozens of photographs, videos (poor quality) and audio recordings. The reliability of this evidence is in doubt. For a long time, one of the most compelling pieces of evidence has been a short film directed by Roger Patterson and Bob Gimlin in 1967 in Northern California. The film was said to be of a female Bigfoot. However, in 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, for whom this shooting was made, there were testimonies of his relatives and acquaintances who said (however, without presenting any material evidence) that the whole story with the "American Yeti" was from the beginning to the end is rigged; forty-centimeter "footprints of the yeti" were made by artificial forms, and the filming was a staged episode with a man in a specially tailored monkey suit.

However, it should be noted that Patterson's film aroused the genuine interest of National Geographic Channel researchers. In "Reality or Fiction" (aired in December 2010), an attempt was made to study and investigate Patterson's film in terms of the possibility of its falsification. Experienced make-up artists, a tall actor imitating a gait, special effects specialists and scientists were involved as experts. rated appearance creatures in the film, their hair adjacent to the muscles, the proportions of the limbs, the dynamics of movement, the shooting distance was taken into account, etc. As a result, according to the unanimous opinion of the experts involved, even at the current level of development of the media industry and video effects, not to mention the level 1967, it is almost impossible to achieve such a degree of realism in the Bigfoot story.

On the other hand, from enthusiasts of this topic one can hear accusations against "official science" that its representatives simply brush aside the available evidence. Here is a typical text of this kind:

In fact, those who say “no reason” simply do not even want to get acquainted with what “dug up” by enthusiastic researchers. “We hear a lot of examples of this in history.” I will give only two. When the Canadian Rene Dahinden brought us a copy of the film shot by Patterson in 1967 at the end of 1971, I personally approached the then director of the Institute of Anthropology of Moscow State University V.P. would recoil from the proposal and say; "No! No need!" But this did not prevent him from declaring that there were no grounds ...
And when at the international symposium, which he (Yakimov) chaired, Professor Astanin went to the podium to present to the audience the materials of the anatomical study of the yeti hand from the Pangboche monastery (Tibet), Yakimov did not let him speak and drove him from the podium in violation of the democratic traditions of such forums - to the protesting exclamations of the participants ... As a result, some of them left the symposium session.
And a recent example: when I arrived from the USA after a five-week “investigation” of events at the Carter farm in the fall of 2004, where, according to the owner, the Bigfoot clan lived, and offered to speak and talk about the results in the anthropology department of the Institute of Ethnology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, its head. S. Vasiliev declined under the pretext of being busy with other issues.
At the same time, when there was a fuss in the press about the existence of a “snowman” in the mountains of Shoria (south of the Kemerovo region), the same Vasiliev stated without hesitation: “Alas, we do not have data on the existence of humanoids, anywhere in the world"…
Igor Burtsev, Ph.D. ist. Sciences, Director of the International Center for Hominology, Moscow.

The Soviet scientist B. F. Porshnev paid great attention to the topic of Bigfoot.

Commission of the Academy of Sciences for the Study of the Question of the Bigfoot

Commission members J.-M. I. Kofman and Professor BF Porshnev and other enthusiasts continued to actively search for Bigfoot or its traces.

Society of Cryptozoologists

References in history and literature

Abstract drawing of Bigfoot.

Numerous images of creatures similar to Bigfoot are known (on art objects of Ancient Greece, Rome, Ancient Armenia, Carthage and the Etruscans and medieval Europe) and references, including in the Bible (in Russian translation shaggy), Ramayana ( rakshasas), in Nizami Ganjavi's poem "Iskander-name", folklore of different peoples ( faun, satyr And strong in Ancient Greece, yeti in Tibet, Nepal and Bhutan, ghoul baths in Azerbaijan, chuchunny, chuchunaa in Yakutia, almas in Mongolia, zhen (野人 ), maozhen(毛人) and renxiong(人熊) in China, kiik-adam And albasty In Kazakhstan , goblin, shish And shishiga the Russians, div in Persia (and Ancient Rus'), chugaister in Ukraine , virgins And albasty in the Pamirs shurale And yarymtyk among Kazan Tatars and Bashkirs, arsuri among the Chuvash picene among the Siberian Tatars, abnahuayu in Abkhazia , sasquatch In Canada , terik, girkychavylyin, myrygdy, kiltan, arynk, arysa, rackem, julia in Chukotka, trampoline, sedapa And orangpendek in Sumatra and Kalimantan, agogwe, kakundakari And ki lomba in Africa, etc.). In folklore, they appear in the form of satyrs, demons, devils, goblin, water, mermaids, etc.

Opponents of the Bigfoot version of the existence, which include most professional biologists and anthropologists, point to the lack of unambiguous evidence (living individuals or their remains, high-quality photographs and videos) and the possibility of arbitrary interpretation of the available evidence. There are frequent references to a well-known biological fact: the long-term existence of a population requires a minimum number of about hundreds of individuals, whose vital activity, according to critics, simply cannot be imperceptible and leave numerous traces. The explanations put forward for the evidence generally boil down to the following set of versions:

Links

see also

Notes

1. K. Eskov. "Crypto, sir!"
2. Patterson film
3. B. F. Porshnev The current state of the issue of relic hominoids Viniti, Moscow, 1963
4. Soviet "snowman". Magazine "Itogi"
5. Jeanne-Maria Kofman
6. see for example, "Popular Biological Dictionary", 1991, Ed. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, edited by Corresponding Member A. V. Yablokov
7. V. B. Sapunov, Doctor of Biol. Sciences Bigfoot in two dimensions, or an alternative to the noosphere
8. J. Kofman At the origins of a new science (On the 40th anniversary of the publication of the monograph by Professor B. F. Porshnev " Current state question of relic hominoids" VINITI 412 since 1963) "Median" magazine No. 6 2004
9. KAZAKHSTAN CHRONICLE "P" Year 1988
10. Trakhtengerts M. S. Habitat of alamas primate species Journal of Natural and Technical Sciences ISSN 1684-2626, 2003, No. 2, pp. 71-76
11. Dmitri Bayanov, Igor Bourtsev In The Footsteps of the Russian Snowman 240 pages Pyramid Publications 1996 ISBN 5-900229-18-1 ISBN 978-5-900229-18-8
12. B. A. Shurinov Paradox of the 20th century « International relationships» 315str. 1990 ISBN 5-7133-0408-6
13. A Russian biologist considers the Sasquatch and other Yeti to be feral oligophrenics.
14. Beiko V. B., Berezina M. F., Bogatyreva E. L. et al. Great Encyclopedia of the Animal World: Nauch.-Pop. edition for children. - M.: CJSC "ROSMEN-PRESS", 2007. - 303 p. UDC 087.5, LBC 28.6, p. 285.

Bigfoot - myth or reality? Billions of people on Earth want the answer to this question.

Are you interested in the topic bigfoot photo or bigfoot video film? This article is about just that! Bigfoot or, as he is also called, bigfoot, hominoid, sasquatch is a humanoid creature that is believed to be found in the highlands and forest regions of the world. There is an opinion that this is a mammal that belongs to the order of primates and to the genus man, preserved from the time of human ancestors. Swedish naturalist, creator unified system animal classification and flora Carl Linnaeus identified him as Homo troglodytes, or, in other words, a caveman.

Descriptive Characteristics of Bigfoot

There is no exact description of Bigfoot. Some say that these are huge four-meter animals that are distinguished by mobility. Others, on the contrary, say that his height does not exceed 1.5 meters, he is passive and swings his arms strongly when walking.

All Bigfoot researchers are inclined to conclude that the yeti is a good creature, if it is not angry

According to unconfirmed reports, the yeti differs from modern humans in its pointed skull, thicker build, short neck, longer arms, short hips, and massive lower jaw. Its entire body is covered with reddish gray or black hair. The hair on the head is longer than on the body, and the beard and mustache are very short. It has an unpleasant strong odor. Among other things, he is excellent at climbing trees.

It is believed that the habitat of Bigfoot is the snowy edge, which separates forests from glaciers. At the same time, forest populations of snowmen build nests on tree branches, while mountain populations live in caves. They feed on lichens and rodents, and, before eating, the caught animals are butchered. This may indicate a close relationship with a person. In case of hunger, yeti approach people, and thus behave carelessly. According to the villagers, in case of danger, the humanoid savage makes a loud barking sound. But Chinese peasants talk about how snow people weave simple baskets, and also make axes, shovels and other elementary tools.

Descriptions suggest that the yeti is a relic hominoid that lives in married couples. However, it is possible that some people with overdeveloped unnatural hairline are mistaken for these creatures.

Early references to Bigfoot

The very first historical evidence of the existence of Bigfoot is associated with the name of Plutarch. He talked about how Sulla's soldiers caught a satyr who, according to the description, matches the appearance of a yeti.

In his short story Horror, Guy de Maupassant describes the meeting of the writer Ivan Turgenev with a female Bigfoot. There is also documentary evidence that in the 19th century there was a woman named Zana in Abkhazia, who was the prototype of the yeti. She had peculiar habits, but this did not prevent her from safely giving birth to children from people who, in turn, were distinguished by mighty strength and good health.

In the West in 1832 there were reports of a strange creature living in the Himalayas. B. G. Hodtson, an English traveler and explorer, settled in a highland region to study this mysterious creature. Later Hodtson B.G. in his works he talked about a tall humanoid creature, which the Nepalese called a demon. It was covered with long thick hair, differed from the animal in the absence of a tail and upright walking. The first mention of the Yeti Hodtson was told by local residents. According to them, for the first time about Bigfoot was mentioned in the fourth century BC.

Half a century later, the Briton Lawrence Waddell became interested in savages. At an altitude of 6,000 meters in Sikkim, he found footprints. After analyzing them and talking with local residents, Lawrence Waddell concluded that predatory yellow bears, which very often attack yaks, are mistaken for humanoid savages.

The growth of interest in bigfoot was observed in the 20-30s of the twentieth century, when one reporter called the hairy savage "a terrible bigfoot". In means mass media it was also reported that several Bigfoot were caught and imprisoned, after which they were shot as Basmachi. In 1941, the colonel of the medical service of the Soviet army Karapetyan V.S. made an inspection of a snowman caught in Dagestan. Shortly thereafter, the mysterious creature was shot dead.

Bigfoot theories and film

To date, scientists do not have sufficient data to make an official confirmation of the validity of one of the theories. However, scientists are voicing rather bold hypotheses about the emergence of the Yeti, which have the right to exist. Their opinions are based on the study of hair and footprints, photographs taken, audio recordings, identikit strange creature, as well as videos that are not of the best quality.

For a long time, a short film directed by Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson in 1967 in Northern California was the most compelling evidence for the Yeti's existence. According to the authors, they managed to capture a female Bigfoot on film.

This happened in the fall, when Bob and Roger rode horses along a densely forested gorge in the hope of meeting a yeti, whose traces were repeatedly seen in these places. At one point, the horses were frightened of something and reared up, after which Patterson noticed a certain large creature that was squatting on the bank of the stream near the water. Glancing at the cowboys, this mysterious creature got up and walked away towards the steep slope of the gorge. Roger was not taken aback and, having taken out a video camera, ran to the stream for the creature. He ran after the savage, shooting him in the back. However, he realized that it was necessary to fix the camera and follow the moving creature, after which he knelt down. Suddenly, the creature turned and started walking towards the camera, but then, turning a little to the left, it left the stream. Roger tried to rush after him, however, thanks to his fast walking and large size, the mysterious creature quickly disappeared, and the film on the video camera ran out.

The Gimlin-Patterson film was immediately rejected by specialists from the most important scientific center in the United States - the Smithsonian Institution - as a fake. American experts said that such a hybrid with a hairy chest, gorilla head and human legs simply cannot exist in nature. At the end of 1971, the film was brought to Moscow and shown to a number of scientific institutions. Specialists Central Research Institute of prosthetics and prosthetics have positively evaluated it and are very interested in it. After a detailed study of the film, a written conclusion was made by the professor of the Academy physical culture D.D. Donskoy, who noted that the gait of the creature on the film is absolutely not typical for a person. He regarded it as a natural movement, in which there were no signs of artificiality, and which is characteristic of various deliberate imitations.

Renowned sculptor Nikita Lavinsky also believed that the Gimlin-Patterson film was authentic. Based on the frames of this film, he even created sculptural portraits of a female Bigfoot.

The participants of the seminar on hominology Alexandra Burtseva, Dmitry Bayanov and Igor Burtsev undertook the most in-depth study of this film. Burtsev made a photographic reproduction with various expositions of stills from the film. Thanks to this work, it was proved that the head of the creature on the film was not a gorilla, as the Americans claimed, and not an ordinary person, but a paleoanthrope. It is also clear that the hairline is not a special costume at all, since the muscles of the back, legs and arms are clearly visible through it. The Yeti also differs from a human in its elongated upper limbs, the absence of a visible neck, the planting of the head, and an elongated barrel-shaped torso.

The arguments on which Patterson's film is based are:

• The ankle joint of the mysterious creature, captured on film, has exceptional flexibility, which is unattainable for a person. The foot in the dorsal direction has more flexibility than a human. Dmitry Bayanov was the first to draw attention to this. Later, this fact was confirmed and described in his publications by Jeff Meldrum, an American anthropologist.

• The Yeti's heel sticks out much more than the human heel, which corresponds to the structure of the Neanderthal foot.

• The then head of the department of biochemistry at the Academy of Physical Culture, Dmitry Donskoy, who studied the film in detail, concluded that the gait of a strange creature on the film is completely not inherent in Homo Sariens, which, moreover, cannot be recreated.

• The film clearly shows the muscles on the limbs and body, which in turn eliminates the assumption of a suit. The whole anatomy distinguishes this mysterious creature from a man.

• A comparison of the frequency of hand vibrations with the speed at which the film was shot proved that the hairy creature was rather tall, about 2 meters 20 centimeters, and if you take into account the complexion, then big weight- more than 200 kilograms.

Based on these considerations, Patterson's film was deemed authentic. About it on scientific publications reported in the USA and the USSR. However, if the film is recognized as authentic, then the existence of living relic hominids, which are considered extinct tens of thousands of years ago, is recognized. Anthropologists cannot yet agree to this. Hence the endless number of rebuttals of the authenticity of excellent film evidence.

Among other things, ufologist Shurinov B.A. contrary to popular belief, claims that Bigfoot is of alien origin. Other researchers of the yeti mysteries insist that the origin is associated with interspecific hybridization on anthropoids, thus putting forward the theory that Bigfoot occurred as a result of crossing monkeys with humans in the Gulag.

Bigfoot photo real. Bigfoot family in Tennessee (USA)

Real photo of a frozen yeti

In December 1968, two famous cryptozoologists, Bernard Euvelmans (France) and Ivan Sanderson (USA), examined the frozen corpse of a hairy hominoid found in the Caucasus. The results of the survey were published in the scientific collection of cryptozoologists. Euvelmans identified the frozen yeti as a "modern Neanderthal".

At the same time active search Bigfoot were also conducted in the former USSR. The most significant results were given by the studies of Maria-Janna Kofman in the North Caucasus, Alexandra Burtseva in Chukotka and Kamchatka. Scientific expeditions in Tajikistan and Pamir-Altai led by Igor Tatsl and Igor Burtsev ended very fruitfully. On Lovozero (Murmansk region) and in Western Siberia, Maya Bykova successfully searched. Vladimir Pushkarev devoted a lot of time to the search for the Yeti in Komi and Yakutia.

Unfortunately, the last expedition of Vladimir Pushkarev ended tragically: due to lack of funds for a full-fledged expedition, he went alone in September 1978 to Khanty-Mansiysk Okrug in search of Bigfoot and went missing.

Janice Carter has been friends with the Yeti (Bigfoot) family for decades!

IN last years interest in the Yeti is reviving, new regions of distribution of modern Neanderthals have appeared. In 2002, Janice Carter, a Tennessee farm owner, said in a television interview that a whole family of Bigfoots had been living near her farm for more than fifty years. According to her, in 2002, the father of the "snowy" family was about 60 years old, and their first acquaintance took place when Janice was a seven-year-old girl. Janice Carter met Bigfoot and his family many times in her life. This drawing was made from her words and clearly shows the proportions of the yeti and its peacefulness.

Recently, Russian hominologists (Yeti researchers) found information that in 1997 in France, in the small town of Bourganef, a frozen body of a Bigfoot was demonstrated, allegedly found in Tibet and smuggled from China. There are many inconsistencies in this story. The owner of the refrigerator in which the corpse of the yeti was transported disappeared without a trace. Gone was the van itself, with its sensational contents. Photos of the body were shown by Janice Carter, who confirmed that she did not rule out that this was not a falsification, but the real Bigfoot body.

Bigfoot video. Yeti speculation and falsification

In 1958, Ray Wallace, a resident of the American town of San Diego, launched a sensational story about the Bigfoot, which is a relative of the yeti living in the mountains of California. It all started with the fact that in August 1958, an employee of Wallace's construction company came to work and saw huge footprints around the bulldozer that looked like human ones. The local press dubbed the mysterious creature the Bigfoot, and thus America got its own kind of Bigfoot.

In 2002, after the death of Ray Wallace, his family decided to reveal the secret. The footprints, 40 centimeters long, were cut from boards at Ray's request, after which he and his brother put these paws on their feet and walked around the bulldozer.

He was so captivated by this prank for many years that he could not stop and periodically pleased the media and the society of lovers of the mysterious either with a recording on which he makes sounds, or with photographs with blurry monsters. But the most interesting thing was that the relatives of the deceased Wallace announced the falsification of the film, which was shot by Patterson and Gimlin. Many experts assumed that the footage was genuine. However, according to relatives and acquaintances, this filming was a staged episode in which Wallace's wife starred, dressed in a specially tailored monkey costume. This statement was a solid blow to enthusiasts who are trying to find a humanoid mysterious creature.

But back in 1969, John Green consulted the Disney film studio, who created monkey costumes for the actors, in order to determine the authenticity of the film. They said that the creature that was filmed was wearing real skin, not a suit.

It should be noted that hundreds of volumes of scientific literature are devoted to the observations of the hominoid. But there is still no concrete answer to the question of its origin and existence. On the contrary, the longer the research and search lasts, the more acutely questions are raised. Why can't catch Bigfoot? Can small populations of these creatures survive in unconnected areas? And there are many more questions that have not yet been answered...

I bring to your attention an excellent film about the Yeti with good video quality, dedicated to all aspects of this most interesting topic, which has been exciting the minds of people around the world for many years.

The Bigfoot or Yeti

Big Foot(Yeti, Bigfoot, Sasquatch) is a legendary humanoid creature that lives in the highlands of our planet. Many enthusiasts claim that the yeti exists, but so far no confirmation of this has been found.

There is an opinion that Bigfoot belongs to the genus of primates, i.e. is a distant relative of man. If you believe the hypotheses and unconfirmed data, Bigfoot differs significantly from modern Homo sapiens. Yeti has a larger and more dense physique, the shape of his skull is pointed, he has longer arms, a shorter neck, and lower jaw more massive. The entire body of a snowman is covered with hair, which can be of various colors: from black and red to gray. Yeti's face is dark in color. The hair on his head is longer than on his body. Bigfoot has a mustache and a beard, although they are rare. Yetis are great climbers. There is an opinion that mountain yeti live in caves, and forest ones make nests on tree branches. Carl Linnaeus named the mountain yeti Homo troglodytes, which means "caveman".

From the point of view of ethnography, the ideas about Bigfoot and its varieties are very interesting. The image of a terrible huge and wild man can only be a reflection of fears of the darkness of the night forest and the unknown. It is quite plausible version that the departed and feral people were taken for yeti.
If the relic bigfoot exists, then most likely they live in pairs. They can move on their hind limbs. Their height ranges from 1 to 2.5 m. Most of the meetings with the Yeti took place in the mountains of Central Asia and in North America. In Sumatra, Africa and Kalimantan, there are individuals no more than 1.5 m tall. There is a version that there are three different types snowman. The first type has already been sufficiently studied and documented, it is he who owns the prints of bare feet found in the snows of Mount Everest at an altitude of 21,000 feet (6.4 km) in 1921.

This picture was taken by Colonel Howard-Bury, a respected and well-known climber. This happened when he led an expedition to Everest. After examining the footprints, local porters reported that the footprints were left by a kangmi sword. This is a bigfoot: "kang" means "snow", "mi" - "man", "sword" is translated as "disgustingly smelling". And so the word sword-kangmi was born. Until recently, it was believed that the Yeti lives only in the Himalayas and Tibet. At the moment, the Pamir, Central Africa, hard-to-reach areas of Yakutia, Chukotka, and the lower reaches of the Ob River are also considered to be the habitat of the Yeti. In the 1970s, there were reports of yeti sightings in the United States. There he was nicknamed "bigfoot".

The American scientist Roger Pattersen managed to capture the Bigfoot. In one of the gorges in Northern California, the scientist was able to approach the Bigfoot forty meters. The tape was sent for examination to Moscow, London. Forensic scientists, biomechanics, anthropologists, orthopedic prosthetists were involved in the analysis. The experts gave the following conclusion: the gait of the creature is not at all like the gait of a person. The British conducted research independently of the Russians, but the opinions of scientists coincided: Pattersen really filmed the yeti in its natural environment.