Review. What is a review and how to write it Thesaurus of Russian business vocabulary

Literary and artistic works before their publication, protection, etc.

Big Encyclopedic Dictionary. 2000 .

Synonyms:

See what “REVIEW” is in other dictionaries:

Review is a genre of journalism, as well as scientific and artistic criticism. A review informs about a new work and contains it brief analysis and evaluation. Translated from Latin, “recensio” means “view, message, rating, review... ... Wikipedia

- (etimol. see previous page). Analysis, evaluation of the essay. Dictionary of foreign words included in the Russian language. Chudinov A.N., 1910. REVIEW [lat. recensio inspection, examination] 1) lit. article, the purpose of which is a critical analysis of what kind of... ... Dictionary of foreign words of the Russian language

One of the most common critical genres. R. are compiled in thick magazines so-called. "bibliographic" department. R. critical analysis of a work of a literary, artistic, scientific, journalistic nature, etc., providing information about ... ... Literary encyclopedia

Cm … Synonym dictionary

REVIEW, reviews, women. (from Latin recensio revision). 1. Critical review of a play, concert, scientific or literary work. 2. The same as the 2nd word edition. (philol.). New review by Cicero. Ushakov's explanatory dictionary. D.N. Ushakov. 1935... ... Ushakov's Explanatory Dictionary

Reviewers have the right not only to tell people to their faces that they are fools, but even to prove it to them. Georg Lichtenberg Writing a review takes so much time that there is no time to read the book itself. Groucho Marx The reviewer rarely likes books about... ... Consolidated encyclopedia of aphorisms

review- REVIEW, review REVIEW / REVIEW, owls. review, review/review... Dictionary-thesaurus of synonyms of Russian speech

review- A review, or otherwise a critical analysis, is written about any work and never about any work. Sentences like: A review of a new film was published in the newspaper (needed for a new film) are incorrect... Dictionary of Russian language errors

REVIEW, and, women. Critical review of what n. essay, play, film. R. for a book or about a book. Submit the article for review. Negative, positive p. | adj. review, oh, oh. Ozhegov's explanatory dictionary. S.I. Ozhegov, N.Yu. Shvedova... ... Ozhegov's Explanatory Dictionary

An article, a note in a periodical press, the purpose of which is a critical analysis of any scientific or work of art, play, movie, etc. Raizberg B.A., Lozovsky L.Sh., Starodubtseva E.B.. Modern economic... ... Economic dictionary

Books

Review as a journalistic genre. Monograph, Nabieva Elena Aibulatovna. The book systematizes the theory of the genre and, based on the analysis of six types of reviews (book, theater, music, film review, festival and exhibition review), tactics are identified...
Review as a journalistic genre, Elena Aibulativna Nabieva. The book systematizes the theory of the genre and, based on the analysis of six types of reviews (book, theater, music, film review, festival and exhibition review), tactics are identified...

REVIEW, -i, g. Critical review of something. essay, play, film. R. for a book or about a book. Submit the article for review. Negative, positive p. || adj. review, -aya, -oh.

View value REVIEW in other dictionaries

Review- review
Synonym dictionary

Review by J.— 1. An article containing a critical analysis and assessment of a scientific or artistic work, performance, concert, etc.
Explanatory Dictionary by Efremova

Review- reviews, w. (from Latin recensio - revision). 1. Critical review of a performance, concert, scientific or literary work. 2. The same as the 2nd word edition. (philol.). New review by Cicero.
Ushakov's Explanatory Dictionary

Review- -And; and. [from lat. recensio - consideration] An official written review containing an analysis and assessment of something. scientific essay, work of art. Write, publish,......
Kuznetsov's Explanatory Dictionary

Review- an article, a note in periodicals, the purpose of which is critical analysis of something for a scientific or artistic work, performance, film, etc.
Economic dictionary

Review- -1) an article, a note in a periodical press, the purpose of which is a critical analysis of a class. scientific or artistic work, performance, film, etc.; 2) review,........
Legal Dictionary

Review- (from Latin recensio - consideration) -1) newspaper and magazine genre; critical analysis and evaluation of a new artistic or scientific work. 2) Review of a scientific work or literary work.....
Large encyclopedic dictionary

The section is very easy to use. Just enter the desired word in the field provided, and we will give you a list of its meanings. I would like to note that our site provides data from various sources - encyclopedic, explanatory, word-formation dictionaries. Here you can also see examples of the use of the word you entered.

The meaning of the word review

review in the crossword dictionary

Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. D.N. Ushakov

review

reviews, w. (from Latin recensio - revision).

Critical review of a performance, concert, scientific or literary work.

The same as the 2-digit edition. (philol.). New review by Cicero.

Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. S.I.Ozhegov, N.Yu.Shvedova.

review

And, well. Critical review of something. writing, performance, film. R. for a book or about a book. Submit the article for review. Negative, positive p.

adj. review, -aya, -oh.

New explanatory dictionary of the Russian language, T. F. Efremova.

review

and. An article containing a critical analysis and assessment of a scientific or artistic work, performance, concert, etc.

Encyclopedic Dictionary, 1998

review

REVIEW (from Latin recensio - review)

newspaper and magazine genre; critical analysis and evaluation of a new artistic or scientific work.

Review of a scientific work or literary and artistic work before its publication, defense, etc.

Review

(from Latin recensio ≈ consideration), analysis and evaluation of a new artistic (literary, theatrical, musical, cinematic, etc.), scientific or popular science work; genre of newspaper and magazine journalism and literary criticism. In R., a bibliographic description of a book publication is given, brief information about the content, composition, range of problems; critical evaluation of the work. R. are published in newspapers and magazines; Specialized critical and bibliographic publications are also published in the USSR - the newspaper “Book Review”; magazines “In the World of Books”, “Literary Review”, etc.; Since 1935, the bibliographic index “Chronicle of Reviews” has been published quarterly (see the article “Chronicles” of the All-Union book chamber). A type of R. is the so-called internal R., performed on the instructions of the editor, publishing house, etc. for a particular manuscript and not intended for publication.

Wikipedia

Review

Review- a genre of journalism, as well as scientific and artistic criticism. A review gives the right to evaluate the work done by a person who needs editing and correction of his work. A review informs about a new work and contains its brief analysis and assessment. Translated from Latin, “recensio” means “viewing, reporting, rating, reviewing something.” A review is a genre that is based on a review of a work. fiction, art, science, journalism, etc. Researcher A. Tertychny in his book “Genres of Periodical Press” considers review to be an analytical genre of journalism. A special type of review is a scientific review, or a review of a scientific work. The subject of the review is information phenomena - books, brochures, performances, films, television shows, games.

Examples of the use of the word review in literature.

A review- although it is the most lengthy, this is not yet a critical article, even if it swells up like the fabled frog that sees the ox.

The last one was review Fry, the one about alliteration and assonant rhymes.

The famous atomic scientist, Professor Otto Hahn, was asked to give review on Klobaz's book for a German special magazine.

Schwartz wrote review for one American film, where main role played by a six-year-old girl, Baby Peggy.

For the bad ones reviews I bought a portable paper cutting machine: it shreds the paper into tiny strips.

Blinded by irritation, Herder was just as wrong in his reproaches as Kant was in his reviews.

From the examples given here reviews bourgeois criticism of Galsworthy's works shows how strong the pressure of reaction was on English literary life.

And the publishing house remained review Gleb Goryshin, excerpts from which are offered below.

Truly, truly, I say to you, the time will come when the actors will play my plays in their sleep, the audience will sleep, and the critic Gottsched, snoring after dinner, will cook the next day. review for some piece of vellum, in which he will say that the new brilliant work of my pen has aroused enthusiasm among the public.

Letter: dear, tra-ta-ta, your book was recommended to us by Sergei Pavlovich Zalygin, we invite you to send the manuscript, including the best from that first book, don’t delay, let’s review We are enclosing the book, it may be useful for you on your periphery, after all, the central publishing house, tra-ta-ta.

Marshak: articles, notes, reviews about children's literature, about literary craftsmanship, about the principles of poetic translation, literary portraits of writers, artists, actors, memoirs, journalistic works.

Writes laws, moral teachings, descriptions of the life and reigns of emperors, songs, fables, stories, novels and reviews on them, he writes textbooks and obituaries, newspaper articles, anonymous letters, brochures on rabbit breeding, texts for posters, essays, dissertations and travel notes.

The publisher sent the manuscript to review Thomas Pynchon, who by that time had published his first two books, received a prestigious prize and earned a solid reputation in literary circles.

The manuscript, contrary to the frivolous promises of Sasha Timofeev, went to Moscow, to the State Committee on Publishing, where it ended up on the internal review to a staff reviewer, a certain A.

Your understanding literary form Kharms outlined in reviews to the concert of Emil Gilels on February 19, 1939.

Not only critics have to write reviews to evaluate various works of art (books, films, theatrical productions), but also competent professionals to express a reasoned and objective opinion about scientific works.

What is a review

A review is a critical review, an expert opinion, which is based on an objective professional analysis of a literary or artistic work or scientific research work - an abstract, article, monograph, essay, master's thesis, course or graduation project, etc.

The term recensio has Latin roots and means “review, review of something,” therefore the main task of the reviewer is to evaluate the work, its merits and demerits. The main thing when writing is objectivity, fairness and impartiality.

Formally, a review can be:

a detailed annotation that reveals the main content of the material and the features of its composition;
a critical or journalistic article with a parallel consideration of current social problems raised in the original source;
essay - the reviewer's reasoning based on reading the material;
review - analysis of several works united by theme, plot, chronology or other characteristics.

How to write

Before starting work, the reviewer must carefully study the material. Depending on the purpose of writing a review, different styles can be used: journalistic or scientific. The main type of speech is reasoning, the presentation is carried out exclusively in a restrained tone, without excessive emotionality.

Structure

Approximate plan for writing a review:

Information about the author, title, etc.
Brief summary of the content (one or two sentences).
A review is an impression of what you read.
Critical analysis: assessment of form, content, compositional features, author’s skill and style of presentation. Highlighting advantages and disadvantages.
A reasoned assessment of the entire work.

If a scientific work is being reviewed, the plan should consist of the following points:

Bibliographic description - title, author, place of study or work.
Main part:
- assessment of the relevance of the topic and the completeness of its disclosure;
- analysis of the text from the point of view of the logical structure, sufficiency of the number of citations confirming a deep theoretical study of the issue;
- compliance of the methods used with the stated purpose of the study;
- the degree of fulfillment of assigned tasks and achievement of goals.
Advantages and disadvantages.
Scientific and practical value of the work.
Compliance of design with GOST standards or methodological recommendations, literacy.
Recommendations:
- according to the final assessment - for coursework, tests or diplomas, essays, etc.;
- about the possibility of publication - for articles, theses, reports, etc.;
- on the assignment of a scientific degree - for candidate and doctoral dissertations.
Information about the reviewer: Full name, position, scientific title, place of work.

Content Features

A review must first of all be objective: the primary source is evaluated regardless of the personal views and preferences of the critic from the standpoint of the scientific, practical or artistic significance of the object of analysis.

When writing you should:

Avoid expressive language, slang, etc. The review should be understandable to a wide range of readers and not contain insults to the author of the original source.
Try not to overload the text with minor details.
Provide evidence base. The reviewer is obliged to justify his own opinion and attitude to the subject.

If a work of art is being reviewed, then the main task is to reveal points that a layman may not pay attention to.

Decor

When submitting a review electronically, you must adhere to general recommendations: font - Times New Roman, 12-14 point, one and a half line spacing. The average volume is from 1 to 3 thousand printed characters, this is about 1-2 Word pages or A4 paper sheets.

Essay review example

A critical review-analysis can be compiled after getting acquainted with scientific work or reading, viewing or studying any material: literary work, essays, films, books.

A sample of writing and formatting a review will allow you to compose it correctly, without making serious mistakes.

REVIEW

on the essay by Vasilyeva N.N.

The topic of the essay is fully covered, without deviations from the main line of reasoning.

The essay consists of logically interconnected sections: introduction, main part and conclusion. The beginning reflects the issues under consideration.

It should be noted that despite the substantial and polemical main part, the conclusions in the finale are not made entirely clearly. But perhaps this was the author’s intention so that the reader could figure them out for himself.

A deep, symbolic epigraph has been successfully chosen, which emphasizes the significance of the topic and adds completeness to the text.

The language of presentation is quite colorful and expressive. The text uses various artistic media: metaphors, comparisons, hyperboles. The techniques used when writing an essay are fully consistent with the genre of argumentation. The style is consistent and does not cause any complaints. There are several non-critical spelling and punctuation errors; speech errors were not noticed.

To summarize, it should be noted that in general the work was completed at the proper level: carefully, accurately - and, despite minor shortcomings, it deserves high praise.

REVIEW

a critical review of some essay, performance, film by R. on a book or about a book. Submit the article for review. Negative, positive p.

Ozhegov. Ozhegov's Dictionary of the Russian Language. 2012

Review. What is a review and how to write it Thesaurus of Russian business vocabulary